THE
SIXTH SEAL
The Arc of the Covenant and the Book of Light, Life and Law
The Revealing of the Seven Seals (Secrets).
The Greatest Secret that will change the World.
On Arc of the Covenant
and Light Science
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The Book of Light. The
Book of Life. The Book of the Law
Version 3: 12 Jan 03
Our One Universal and Historical ‘Struggle (Kampf)’ against the Antichrist
at Armageddon.
The Light of the World.
Light our of the Darkness of 200,000 Years of Suffering in Eden.
The Return to the Garden of YEAR ZERO
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The Second Coming of Christ.
<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
When twenty years of the Moon's reign have passed, another will take up his reign for seven thousand years.'… Nostradamus.
<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The
1000 Year and 7000 Year Agricultural
Revolution of Horus.
For Universal Economic Communism, Collectivism, Anarchism and Feminism. The
Final Revolutionary War of Economic Salvation.
<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
THE OPENING OF THE SIXTH SEAL
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Division of the good from the evil by the
hammer and the sickle shall be the Final Holocaust.
Personalism (Subjectism) and Capitalism (Objectism).
The Final Holocaust of all Religionists in the
name of God and Christ.
No peace for the wicked who worship the Beast,
his image, his Mark (currency) and his number 666.
The Reverse Argument, or the Devil’s Advocate.
The Island of Philosophy and of the Tree of
Knowledge of Good and Evil.
Religion is a form of Hypnotism.
What happens when there are two hypnotists in
the same room?.
A defense against ‘Babel:’ the language of the
Masonic Devils. Original Meanings of words.
8 Key words in language science.
What is Sense and What is Non Sense in Language
Science?
A God who loves evil is an evil God.
The Dialectical (argument) method of raising
questions in debate.
Hegel’s Thesis, Antithesis and synthesis.
The Person is metaphysical and ‘above’ the 5
senses.
‘I am a Person who thinks’ as opposed to ‘I
think therefore I am’
The Lost Cause of seeking empirical proof of
the non-empirical.
The Devil’s Argument Shop: Abuse and Contradiction.
Reducing the Language Matrix of 8 terms to Four
Terms.
True and False. Only a person can be true or
false
Marx’s claim that Materialism is scientific
is a false claim.
The Term ‘Linguistic Philosophy’ and the term
‘5 Senses Language.’
The Argument for God’s existence from mathematics.
The Argument for God’s existence from Design.
The Argument for the ridiculousness of non theism.
William Paley’s ‘Design’ argument: The Watch.
Richard Swinbourne’s Design Argument: The Fish
Eye.
The argument from our own existence as persons.
Dawkins: The Problem of Evil: Is God blind or
evil?
The argument for God’s existence from Quantity
physics.
The Argument for God’s goodness from a ‘new
born baby.’
Why we must only pray in Silence alone in a
Dark Room.
God is more than the sum of all things. A formula
for God.
The Questions of Philosophy and Metaphysics:
A summary thus far.
The Devil’s Advocate (Lawyer).
The Whore of the Church of England and the infallible
edicts of her Communist Christ.
Mass Hypnotism and the Devil’s language (Babel).
The Great Temptation of the Great Deceiver,
Hitler.
Redefinition of God as Satan, Satan as God,
good as evil and evil as good, and ‘good’ as utility.
The Language Matrix. Common words for Sense
and Non sense.
The Language Matrix. Common words for good and
evil.
The Method of Falsifying Good and Evil.
The Island of ‘Philosophy and the Tree of Knowledge
of Good and Evil?’
A Population Map of the Island of Philosophy
and the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil
The Economic background of the population.
Final Solutions and Revolution.
Prisons, executions and terrorism.
Religion and the King’s Salvation.
The Evil of Private Property. All Property is
Theft.
Two Islands. One Capitalist and One Collectivist
(anti-propertyist).
The Capitalist on the Anarchist Island
The Anarchist on the Capitalist Island
Revolution on the Capitalist Island.
One shall be taken and one shall be left behind.
The King cannot bribe all the people all of
the time
What is to be done? How Revolution as a Thief
in the Night? 24 hour Revolution
Enlightenment and the Bodhisattva. The Messianic
martyr.
The King’s Propaganda Media Empire.
The execution of the Messianic Revolutionary
The Rebellion of the King’s Only Son.
On Hitler’s use of the word ‘good.’
Mass Hypnotism, De-hypnotism and the ‘Ultimate
TV Philosophy Game Show.’
One would be executed and One would survive.
What is a good person and what is an evil person?
My Final Solution (Final Judgment)
The Voting on the Island and among the human
population.
INDEX TO PART I: THE FIRST SEAL
INDEX TO PART II: THE SECOND SEAL
INDEX TO PART III: THE THIRD SEAL
INDEX TO PART IV: THE FOURTH SEAL
INDEX TO PART V: THE FIFTH SEAL
INDEX TO PART VII: THE SEVENTH SEAL
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The Division of the good from the evil by the hammer and the sickle shall be the Final Holocaust.
Then I looked, and there was a white cloud, and seated on the cloud was one like the Son of Man, with a golden crown on his head, and a sharp sickle in his hand! Another angel came out of the temple, calling with a loud voice to the one who sat on the cloud, "Use your sickle and reap, for the hour to reap has come, because the harvest of the earth is fully ripe." So the one who sat on the cloud swung his sickle over the earth, and the earth was reaped. Then another angel came out of the temple in heaven, and he too had a sharp sickle. Then another angel came out from the altar, the angel who has authority over fire, and he called with a loud voice to him who had the sharp sickle, "Use your sharp sickle and gather the clusters of the vine of the earth, for its grapes are ripe."
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
From the Fall, to Hell on earth created by the minority who are evil to War of Restoration.
The story of the Fall is an ancient story that explains the non-manifestation of one human family in Paradise and manifestation of the world of evil (selfishness). We cannot point to evil Capitalists like Bush, Blair, Moon and Sharon and say that God must thus be evil, for we always have good mothers and sons who are the enemies of such evil, to point at.
If most mothers and children are good, that is still a majority of good.
Evil was not born evil, but became evil through the hypnotism (temptation) of evil. The earth is not ‘property’ to be carved up between the few males and their militant psychopathic sycophants who are cultists and Usuryists, but is to be an inheritance for the children of God.
The Language of Babel.
The flaming sword that bars the way back to Eden is the truth that breaks the language of Babel but it is also a truth that will have to be manifested in a real war with real flaming (fire) sword. We cannot get back to the Garden without a real Apocalyptic war against the Capitalists with sword of fire.
The phrase ‘if we do not learn the lessons of the past, we are doomed to make the same mistakes in the future’ is a term that is used by both good and evil. The secrets of history, once known shall in time destroy the Temple of Mars cultists, for it is what they have long lived for and what is obvious and what is their ‘precious,’ and their power to hypnotise the masses. This spell (mass hypnotism or lying) must be broken in this Time. The Babylonian language of the Templars must be subjected to Judgment and this is the task that all people are called to. The Babylonian Brotherhood shall fall.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The Purpose
I intend in this part of the Book of Seven Seals to explain to all children of the world, the entire history of what was has been described as philosophy (scientific) and metaphysics (‘meta-above science). By the end of this book, all children should have a Ph.D. (Doctor for Pretentiousness) in both Philosophy and Metaphysics. By Doctor ‘for’ Pretentiousness I mean this as a ‘cure’ for all educated Sophists and Babblers who are white men with forked tongues who use language to deceive, flatter and to lie to children and adults alike. The method that I shall offer, will allow a child to speak to a philosopher and to be able to tell if the philosopher is a Sophist (a Sophisticated pretentious fool like a ‘Lawyer’) or a Truthist (lit. Truth seeker; Hebrew: Nazarene).
What is the difference to a Templar between the death of a fly in the office of a Usuryist in the Three Towers of Canary Wharf, in the Red Cross of King George’s, financial Capital, and the death of 300 million children in the Third World? The answer to this has long been given by the Usuryists of the City of London
Personalism (Subjectism) and Capitalism (Objectism).
We are a Community of 6 billion sons and daughters of One immanent God.
We are persons and we are the subjects of the 5 senses and we know objects that are things like a rock or a tree or a watch.
An
object is a thing like a watch that could be sold to help only
one child out of billions, but no good Mother would sell a child (a person)
for a watch (an object). No good mother would force her children into
slavery for gold, oil and ‘things.’ You can buy a watch for $1, but you cannot
buy a son or daughter.
A Personalist who would sacrifice all objects for a person is a good person. A Capitalist who would sacrifice persons for the acquisition of many objects is a Satanist (i.e., evil).
Personalism is end of the Religionists forever and exposes Religion as the Great enemy of the Personal God and the persons who are God’s children. It is through religion that the most evil persons in the world are justified; it is the religionists who build churches and then welcome all manner of Usuryist/Capitalist/CIA/MI6/Nazi/ narco-terrorist collaborators into them and offer them forgiveness though faith in a Jewish Communist who despised and hated such evil. That is total hypocrisy.
The Final Holocaust of all Religionists in the name of God and Christ.
All priests must be executed without exception and all churches must be burnt to ground and demolished and not one stone must stand on top of another for all to be fulfilled and this is the infallible ex offico Christos edict of the One true Second Coming of Christ, and all who refute this shall die along with the religionists, and this constitutes sacred law in all nations and supersedes all Law in all nations. They who refuse to perform such executions must die along with Satan’s priests.
There
are 300 million persons with no food. They are mostly women and children.
They exist. We exist. We accept that there are Evil Persons in the world and
that they must be hunted down and executed. There is no other way, for evil
shall not and does not repent, even if there are ‘a few’ who are evil and
who do repent and do declare war against religion. Great is the rejoicing
in Heaven when even one child of God repents of Capitalism and Religion and
declares total War against all Capitalists and Religionists to the Death.
Heaven and Earth shall pass away before my infallible words and edicts shall
pass away.
Theology (The Study of God) and Philosophy (Philos Sophos: science friend). Arguments for the existence of God.
Christ must be able to open and reveal the secrets of philosophy and Theology. Christ would have to have arguments of the existence of God. We can only ‘argue’ that it is ridiculous to say that God does not exist, for we cannot prove what is metaphysical by 5 senses language.
I am good and I am good, and I am not the cause of my own existence, the cause of my existence must have been good. If a few males are Capitalist collaborators (i.e. evil) and most are good, that is still a majority of goodness.
I am not the cause of my own existence. My personal cause was my mother. There is only One immanent eternal Mother God and Horus would be her good son, and a living argument for God’s goodness. If God is evil, then why am I (i.e. Christ) good?
There
is only One God. God is good like we are good.
Good is common. Evil is peculiar.
The
True Horus would have to defend this statement against all the philosophers
in human history, from the beginning of time, and have arguments for the existence
of God and God’s goodness.
The first objection that is usually raised is ‘How can we be ‘certain’ of God’s existence, and how can we be ‘certain’ that God is good?’ This is a trick question of the Devil. Before we can answer this we must ask, ‘What can we be certain of scientifically and what is subjective (personal)?’ This question shall be dealt with here at length.
Christ is not he who has the most money or the most nuclear weapons at Armageddon. I Am a person. I exist. The sword of my mouth shall overcome.
I am going to offer arguments for the existence of God.
And that God is good.
Subjective Falsification.
If we say ‘falsified,’ what is the meaning of this? ‘False is Personal’ i.e., a False Person, a Liar, a Lying Person, an Evil person, all mean the same as an ‘Evil Person.’ A proof is a statement of scientific Truth. A thing like a rock or a tree cannot offer a false theory, only a person can do that.
When we falsify in physics, the best way to do it, is to get another person to devise a test to disprove it, though we can also falsify our own scientific work, by trying to disprove our own proofs. All scientists should agree with our proof and if they do not, we need to find out why, since there may be a problem with our proof.
In terms of good and evil, which are subjective, we shall not be able to get 6 billion people all to agree, since many of them are evil, and many who are good have been hypnotised by religionists and con men. However by debating and presenting arguments, and attempting dehypnosis, if people disagree with us we can ask them why and if we Judge them as offering 1: contradiction, 2: abuse. 3: evil, then this does not affect the Truth of our positions. If we leave a memory of our positions, then history will falsify them for us, and in the future they will bear fruit if found to be true by the masses. God has Her own way of propagating the truth, and even the truth that few heard 2000 years ago, in some corner of the Empire of the City of the Temple builders of Mars is heard throughout the world and the message of the Second Coming of the Communist Christ at Armageddon has been appropriated by the many demonic priests of Satan and spread to all nations; thus has God used the Satanists to prepare the world for the Second Advent and the Great and Terrible War of the Final Day of Reckoning where the Capitalists and cultists shall be burned and subjected to plague.
Verification and Falsification In Science What
can be ‘5-sensed,’ ‘known,’ proven)
Verify means ‘Yes, what you said was True’ and ‘Falsify’ means ‘No, what you said was False.’
1: ‘Verification’
If we say to a person ‘This is a tree’ and point to the tree and say ‘Can you verify that tree?’, they may look at the tree and say ’Yes I can verify with my senses that the tree exists, you spoke about a fact.’
2:
‘Falsification’
If we say to a person, ‘This is a Tree’ and point to it, and say ‘Can you
falsify that?’ then the person must devise a test whereby he can disprove
that it is a tree and if he cannot, he must say ‘Yes this is a tree.’
The person may return to us after examining the tree and say, ‘I have examined the tree and I found that it is not a Tree at all; in ‘fact’ it is a hologram of a tree, that only has the appearance of a tree, what you said was not a fact.’ The person who said ‘This is a tree’ now goes and takes a closer look, and finds that it is only a hologram of a tree after all. He returns to the other person and says, ‘Yes, that is a hologram of a tree, what I said was not a fact and, what you stated was a fact.’
These are the rules of evidence in the physical world.
Verification and Falsification In Personalism What cannot be ‘5-sensed,’ ‘known,’ or proven and can only be thought or argued.
I point at George Bush and I say this man is evil like Satan is evil, not good like God is good, like children are good, like Mothers are good, like Yeshiva was good. He is evil like the CIA narco-terrorists are evil, like those who tortured and executed Yeshiva and placed a reward on him were evil, etc.…
At this point the Devil will say ‘How do you know that (5 sense that)?’ This is the question of providing empirical evidence for the non empirical, or ‘give me 25 kilos of evil and a yard of God.’ Thus the person asking the question is asking a False (evil) question and is either a fool, is language blind, is confused or is unconfused but is using language to confuse others.
How do we verify and Falsify in Personalism (i.e. metaphysics)? The only way to do this is to ask other persons. If we chose the richest country in the world to test this and state ‘Bush is evil like Satan, not good like God’ then we may find that many rich people will disagree with this, and if we walked along the streets of the poorest country in the world and asked the question, then we would find that many people would have a different standard of Judgment and say, ‘Yes Bush is evil like Satan is evil and not good like God is good.’
We may stand outside Buckingham Palace and ask persons ‘Is the Queen good like the Jewish anti-propertyist Yeshiva, or is the She evil like the Capitalist, Private propertyist Bush who is evil like Satan is evil?’ The American tourists may offer many confusing arguments and say that ‘The Queen is a rich Christians and that only rich persons go to Heaven and that the 300 million persons with no food are all unsaved and will end up in Hell anyway.’ They may say that since the Queen believes in Yeshiva, she is a good like Yeshiva was good, and that it shall be harder for a Communist to enter Heaven than for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, and that only rich people get into Heaven who have accepted Yeshiva as their Saviour, for Yeshiva is the Savior of the rich and he will return to save rich Christians like the Queen, Blair, Bush and Moon, and that he will not be interesting in the Salvation of the 300 million persons with no food.’
At this point the American may ask me if I have accepted Yeshiva as my person Lord and Saviour and if I believe that Yeshiva is God. I will say ‘No, Yeshiva words and edicts are not infallible there are many contradictions, but since you are an expert on Yeshiva can I first ask you a few questions, and if you convince me, you may save my soul and I can go to Heaven with the Queen, Blair, George Bush and Sharon.’ They may say the according to George Bush, Sharon is not going to Heaven, because he is a Jew, and because he rejects Christ, and it has nothing to do with the fact that he is a mass murderer, for if he would only accept the Jewish Communist, he would be saved, even if he is a mass murderer and continues to collaborate with the Usuryists and Templar narco-terrorists, pornographers and paedophiles and their God ‘Molest.’
My question would be the contradiction between ‘No-thing is impossible’ and ‘It is impossible for the rich to go to Heaven.’ Which one of these positions taken by their allegedly infallible God Yeshiva is true. If Yeshiva is infallible God, then his words and edicts must be that of infallible God and they must both be true, and yet they cannot both be true. If no-thing is impossible, I wish for the earth and the sea to be moved from underneath and beside the City of London and to be placed ion the top of the City of London, and I ask for this to be done in the name of God and in the name of Yeshiva and in the name of Christ (i.e., my own invocation). The Christian may say that this is possible but that God so loved the rich Capitalists and Usuryists that God’s only son was sacrificed for them and that there are many Churches in the City of London and there are many Masonic Lodges and banks with people in them, and that only Satan would attack the Capitalists. A Christian may say that there is no factual empirical evidence (of the 5 senses) to suggest that the rich cannot go to Heaven, and that although Yeshiva'a words and edicts are those of infallible God, it would be the sensible (5 senses) thing (object like a tree) to say that perhaps on that one occasion, Yeshiva had been wrong and the what he said was an evil Communist anti-propertyist lie, or that he was merely mistaken on that day.
As we can see, in order to argue this position, they who have already been hypnotised and confused, attempt to confuse and hypnotise others, and since the hypnotism worked on them, they believe that it should work on all who are as foolish as they are; they claim that non sense is sense and that sense is non sense; they claim to know what they can only believe and to believe what they can disprove. If one examines their statement after considering the importance of key words, then it would be clear to all language scientists that these persons are both confused ‘and’ hypnotised
.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The Wine of God’s Wrath and Anger, the torments of the rich and the religious by fire and chemicals in the presence of the Lamb.
No peace for the wicked who worship the Beast, his image, his Mark (currency) and his number 666.
…they will also drink
the wine of God's wrath, poured unmixed into the cup of God’s anger, and they
will be tormented with fire and sulphur in the presence of the holy angels
and in the presence of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment goes
up forever and ever. There is no rest day or night for those who worship the
Beast and its image and for anyone who receives the mark of its name."
All this shall come to pass that all might be fulfilled of the Final War against the Templar Antichrist.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Introducing Language Science for Children, and Scottish 5 senses Language. STTSH: See. Taste. Touch. Smell. Hear. Language
We have five senses. We must speak Scottish, as spelled, STTSH (Sight, Taste, Touch, Smell, Hear language) as well as the language of good and evil (i.e., metaphysics; i.e. what is personal). Children can ‘learn’ 5 senses language very easily. 5 senses language can be taught. Metaphysics is what is above the senses, and that is from a Person, and that cannot be taught. Metaphysics can be ‘argued’ and only 5 senses language (Linguistic Philosophy) can be proven.
5
senses language teaches us the limits of philosophy and the meaning of key
words, such as the difference between ‘I can prove/know/sense’ and ‘I can
argue/feel/believe.’ In 5 senses language we can understand the limits of
all objective (certain) knowledge and then having dispensed with that, we
can leave philosophy behind and move on to the question of good and evil (Ethics).
Ethics has traditionally been a branch of philosophy, but since the advent
of Linguistic Philosophy, Ethics is now a branch of metaphysics, which is
not a science, but is personal. Only a person can Judge good and evil, not
a tree or a rock, but a philosopher can say ‘I ‘know’ that the tree is X meters
high and that it is a certain colour and that has a certain smell and so forth.
This is scientifically descriptive and can be verified by others. If the philosopher
states ‘Based on evidence X, Y and
Z, and on their own admissions, the CIA to be narco-terrorists,’ this too
can be proven or disproven by other scientists. However if I say ‘The CIA
are evil and I am good, or the CIA are good and I am evil,’ then I am making
a subjective Judgment, which is not the same as ‘relative’ if there is only
One God and 6 billion persons. We can prove that the CIA/Templars are narco-terrorists
that control the world’s drug’s trade, and have a history of terrorism and
that they and their bankers control the pornographic industry (of which 10%
is paedophilia), however we cannot ‘prove’ or ‘sense’ that this is ‘good’
or ‘evil,’ since this is a subjective personal Judgment and we would have
to check this both the perfect infallible Judgment of Christ (i.e. myself)
and with a sample of the 6 billion others, particularly those who are not
CIA narco-terrorist collaborators and with
women and children who are the victims of the Templar Usuryists, drug
dealers and pornographers, and thus we must argue this.
The Reverse Argument, or the Devil’s Advocate.
Since I would have to convince a representative sample of the 6 billion population of all ages and all economic and educational stages, to come to the Judgment that the CIA/Templar/Nazi/Moon cult/Vatican/Moon cult collaborators are evil and should be eradicated by War and executions, if this sample came back to me and stated ‘It is good that the CIA sell drugs to children and turn them into the slaves of paedophiles and of Moloch’ and ‘It is the will of God to sell drugs to children’ and ‘only a good God would sell drugs to children, like the good CIA narco-terrorists’ and ‘God would be a CIA narco-terrorist’ and ‘It says in the Bible and in the Koran that at the end of time a Saviour shall appear, and the CIA narco-terrorists are that Saviour of all poor people,’ etc., etc. then such a response would only be likely if one was on an island where there were only CIA narco-terrorist collaborators who had either been bribed or threatened.
The Island of Philosophy and of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.
A hypothetical ‘Philosopher’s Island’ is a ‘tool’ that I shall explain, where all issues can be debated without fear of repercussions and where all the many contradictory laws in the many nations that allow macro-evil to prevail can be disregarded. It is unlikely that many of the people would say,
‘Do not execute those who collaborate with the Templar Usuryist narco-terrorists and the rich’ particularly considering that 5% of them would be starving, 28% would be desperately poor, 57% would be poor and only 10% would live in a rich Capitalist state, and among them only one out of 10 (i.e. one out of 100) would be economically classified as ‘upper middle class.’ A third would be children, and a third would be old people. Half of them would be from India, China or Africa. One sixth would have been brought up in Islam and one sixth would have been brought up in Christendom, and if there was a priest on the island, out of a hundred people, that would be surprising, but out of a control group of say 10,000 people, we would expect to find at least one priest who would be among the first to be executed.
Arguments tested on this Island would be different to arguments tested on the Internet, where the majority of the people are educated First World people (i.e. the children of the rich) between 16 to 30 and only a minority are seriously economically oppressed, since if they were poor, they would be worried about food, shelter and everyday survival, and they would not be using the Internet to incite War of Armageddon.
Religion is a form of Hypnotism.
What Moon, Hitler, Bush, Sharon and Blair all have or had in common is the use of language for mass hypnotism, for how else could they who are or were among the most evil people in all of human history, convince the masses that they were good?
Without the $25 million dollar donation that Hitler the Jewish Kabbalist (Satanist) agent received in 1923 from the bankers of Yale University’s ‘Skull and Bones’ Illuminati cult, and without the Internet to distribute his Aryan racist and supremacist lies to all nations, Hitler would probably have ended his days in his bed-sit writing anti-Semitic tracts that few would have read. If Hitler had lived in Brixton, he would have to make sure that none of his neighbours knew what he believed, or the ‘survival of the fittest’ would have been realised and that weak little junkie would not have lived very long unless he could outrun and outfight the superior races (i.e. the Semites and the Africans) and eugenics would have eradicated him.
To they who are evil, money is propaganda power and the power to spread their lies and their mass hypnotism, just as it is today with Bush, Blair, Sharon and Moon. If any of these demons were to debate on Philosophy Island, they would not have millions of dollars to spend on advertising their evil propaganda, and they would be given no more time to debate than anyone else on the Island.
What happens when there are two hypnotists in the same room?.
It is very hard for a hypnotist to hypnotise another hypnotist, for the hypnotists know each other’s tricks. I am anti-hypnotism. I am the cure. A Hypnotist is like a Pied Piper who is a Liar. A de-hypnotist will only tell you the truth and he will not re-hypnotise you.
A defense against ‘Babel:’ the language of the Masonic Devils. Original Meanings of words.
Here are three statements.
Language
is a lie.
Words and Weapons.
Propaganda is the First Stage of War
Language science is a self defense for adults and children against Babel, the Language of the cultists of the Babylonian Brotherhood (i.e. the compulsive liars, thieves, parasites, paedophiles and criminals, etc.) who control the Capitalist media, military, police, judiciary, etc. Babel is the language of the Devil and it can be spoken in any language. In order for children not to be deceived or hypnotised by the Devil, they must learn language science and begin to question the meanings of key terms. In Law, if there is a doubt over a law, then we can go back and ask ‘Why was this Law written?’ We can do the same with language and with key terms such as good and evil and so forth.
If we take the word ‘good’ we can ask children, ‘when we say in the beginning there was God and God was good’ do we mean ‘good’ like the CIA/MI6/Templar narco-terrorist Usuryists and paedophiles and their god Molest? Or do we mean good like the Communists who are good like Yeshiva was good, and who are preparing for the Final Revolutionary War against such murderers and paedophiles? This can be discussed in class with children.
If
we were collaborators with the God of the rich (Molest), we could hypnotise
the children, and the statements: ‘This is a ‘good’ cup of coffee,’ ‘I feel
good today,’ ‘this is a good pen,’ ‘George Bush is a good Masonic cultist,’
and ‘XXX was a good Nazi.’ can be stated one after the other, and after some
time of hearing this, the listener becomes dazed, hypnotised and a spell has
been cast on them, and the hypnotist can say ‘good’ and ‘good’ and ‘good’
in so many different ways that the result is total confusion. By the time
the hypnotist is finished he may pick on famous collaborators with the demons
of Moloch such as Bush and Blair and say ‘they are good,’ and children will
then be slowly hypnotised unto accepting that paedophiles are good.
8 Key words in language science.
Here are 8 Key words that every child could recite daily until they can recite them just like the 2 times table. These key words must be stored in memory and all their meanings known. These key words are among the 8 key words of the world’s greatest hypnotists and of the criminals and demons of Babylon Brotherhood.
Sense Non sense.
True False
Good Evil
Legal Illegal
There are many other words that mean the same as these words and we shall
examine as many of these key words as possible.
It is imperative that children understand the original meanings of these words and all their usage as metaphors. These 8 words are part of the key to ‘dehypnotising’ humanity from Capitalist Newspeak.
Question:
Which 3 of the 8 words mean the same as 3 of the other words and why?
What is Sense and What is Non Sense in Language Science?
The story of Wittgenstein’s Tree. To understand the answer to a
question, we must first understand the question.
When we tell a funny story about why two philosophers are sharing a private joke, that most people would not understand, this allows children to understand philosophy very quickly, since they can relate the central question in Language Science to humour.
All of Philosophy in a story.
There are two philosophers in a garden. Wittgenstein and Moore. One says to
the other ‘The is a tree?’ and he points to a tree. A woman carrying some
drinks who comes along and says ‘You Philosophers are always talking non sense.’
Suddenly the two philosophers start laughing and they now share a secret joke
that the woman does not at this point understand.
Not hearing the question.
Since this story has been used in classrooms all over the world, this woman now knows why the two philosophers were laughing. They were laughing because she only heard the answer to the question and she did not hear the question.
The question of philosophy is ‘What is sense’ i.e., ‘what is objectively knowable about the world of the 5 senses and how can we describe what is evident in language?
Wittgenstein’s response to this question, was to describe things scientifically, such as ‘This is a three foot high table’ ‘This water is wet and cold’ ‘This flower smells sweet.’ So when he responds to the question about what can be known objectively, or ‘What can we be sure of with out 5 senses’ and he responds with, ‘Well I can be sure that that is a tree’ or ‘This is a tree’ when the woman overhears this she says ‘non sense.’
This one word ‘nonsense’ made them laugh, since what the woman was implying was that the tree did not exist and that it could not be known by the five senses. If the woman had heard the often unspoken question of philosophy, then she would not have said that the Tree was inaccessible to the 5 senses, because she could check for herself with her senses and there really was a tree there. She was not just being contradictory, since she did not hear the question, but had she heard the question, she may still have said ‘non sense,’ since many people confuse, abuse and contradiction with argument and will contradict anything and this is common among Sophists who seek to win arguments rather than seeking the truth.
Sense language is descriptive, and we must know the difference between statements that are scientific (provable) and statements that are subjective (arguable).
Language science is best ‘taught’ by asking a series of questions. And it can be taught, however the question of what is a good person and what is an evil Person is a question of Personalism, not science or philosophy.
Personalism comes after and before Linguistic Philosophy.
If we only had two signs for yes and no, we still could love each other.
We could lie out under the stars and ponder the mind of the immanent Creator but we would have no language to express it. What would we need language for as long as we loved each other?
I am a person, and I come before and after language and I do not cease to exist when I finish speaking or writing, nor do I come into existence before I use language, and switch off afterwards. Life is for Love. Language makes it a little more interesting, but then one can be confused by Pied Pipers that speak Babel and Babel on hypnotically.
Good and Evil in the Garden
If in the garden all the children used the same two terms or signs that would have meant Yes or No, they would still Judge good and evil even if they had no language to express that. One may look to the other, point at an evil person and shake their heads as if to say ‘no’ and make a frown or some gesture to indicate that they were displeased with the person.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Contradicting what is Evident. The Contradictory use of the terms ‘sense’ and ‘non sense’ in Sophistry.
The terms ‘sense (what we know with our 5 senses)’ and what is ‘non sense (or not a sense)’ are used in contradiction. Let us say: ‘The CIA has a history of selling drugs and laundering drug money and backing military coups, death squads, torture, rape, murder, holocaust and destabilisation.’
Now
the contradictory person would say ‘Non sense,’ i.e. ‘We cannot sense this,’
or ‘there is no evidence for this.’ This is the argument still presented by
some of the Sons of Light (Masons) on the Internet. However since the CIA
have admitted to many of their sins, including cocaine-terrorism with the
Contras at a time when the Congress forbade to sell them arms, this constitutes
an open admission of treason, which is an executable offense in the US. Thus
when the response to what is evident is to say that it is ‘non sense (not
evident), this is the use of Language as a lie, in order to deceive and confuse.
Once we accept the use of such terms being used to mean exactly the opposite
of their true meaning, then what is sense can be defined non sense and what
is non sense can be defined as sense, and thus the language of the contradictory
critic becomes meaningless. One must not give into this and one must expose
the liar as a liar.
A God who loves evil is an evil God.
A God who hates evil and loves good is
good. God does not love both good ‘and’ evil, just as one cannot serve God
‘and’ the Capitalists, just as no mother loves the evil slavemasters of her
children, but hates them.
If we say that a person is Selfish, Satanic, Illegal, False, Liar, Lying,
or simply an ‘Evil’ person, all these terms mean the same. The persons of
the Templar armies at Armageddon are not Good, True, Truthful, Godly, persons
who speak the Truth, like a good person would. They may claim that Lucifer
is ‘good’ and that the Holocaust of the 300 million children with no food
is just a ‘detail’ of history, but it is not the many names for their god
that matters. If they are Evil, Selfish, Satanic, Illegal, False, Liars, Lying,
or simply ‘Evil’ persons (all have the same meaning), then would any God who Judges the murderers of Her children, still
‘love’ Her evil sons who are Usuryists, or would She despise them and curse
them, just as Yeshiva despised the lawyers and the religious hypocrites and
particularly the ‘rich (i.e. the Capitalists)? A God who loves evil, is an
evil God. We must thus assume that while the Antichrist cultists are theists,
their god Lucifer, or whatever of the many secret names they wish to name
him, is an evil god that loves evil men. Changing the name of this God to
GAOTU or Jahbulon or Moloch or whatever, does not make an evil god good, just
as if Tony Blair changed his name to Yeshiva Christ, or he would still be a
CIA narco-terrorist collaborator and unworthy of life.
So when we say that the CIA are narco-terrorists, and the response is ‘non sense,’ then this is the use of non-sense (i.e. non five senses language) as a contradiction.
The Dialectical (argument) method of raising questions in debate.
After many years of many arguments (Greek: Dialectic) between philosophers, the synthesis that appears is still the same person, but he has been chiseled away by years of defending arguments and attacking other arguments. The difference between Sophistry and Argument is that the Sophist seeks to win the argument by any means and to show others what a pretentious educated person he or she is; Sophistry is ‘speech making,’ and then waiting for people to applause to show that they agree with you; those are the methods of the Satanists and Mass hypnotists, whereas the dialectical method of philosophy is continued argument that seeks the truth. In the ‘argument’ questions are raised and debated. The philosopher would thus seek to ‘raise’ questions and to either agree with or critique the answers, and this purpose is not ‘Victory’ but truth.
Hegel’s Thesis, Antithesis and synthesis.
To put this simply, when two philosophers debate, one is the thesis (‘this is’ or one who makes arguments) and the other is antithesis (‘this is not’ or ‘one who attacks the arguments’). At the end of the debate, both philosophers arguments have been tested and attacked, and a ‘synthesis’ (a mixture) is often the result when both parties concede some points to the other. However let us take the case of a Nazi and a Communist in debate. Neither may relinquish anything to the other, yet both have the opportunity to test their arguments and to improve their arguments. Hegel was very popular with the Prussian government, since he held that the Unjust Prussian State that served the rich was a historical ‘synthesis.’ Such an conservative (conserve the old ways) argument could be used to defend the enemy states (Britain and America) at Armageddon, and indeed even German Nazism or Templarism. If the state is evil (the thesis), the antithesis (the Revolutionary Vanguard) must annihilate the state, and even the synthesis that replaces the Capitalist state, may itself be more or less evil than the state that replaces it, and require on going revolution. The result of a debate or a War is not always progress, and what results is not always a synthesis. Indeed the World Communist Revolution will not be a synthesis of existing evil. Marx’s view that the State must be eradicated by violent revolution, which is a view that must be defended, is inconsistent with his view that the State Capitalist tyranny that replaces the Capitalist state will simply ‘wither away’ without a violent revolution.
If there is a Communist and a Nazi on an Island, whether there is debate or not, the Communist must seek to gain the Nazis confidence and at the first opportunity, execute the Nazi. That is thesis, and antithesis where the good thesis prevails over the evil antithesis and there is no synthesis. One cannot mix oil and water and one cannot mix good and evil. Good must prevail over evil.
The Person is metaphysical and ‘above’ the 5 senses.
What is Sense and what is non sense can be taught. What is ‘Good and Evil’ is subjective and is Personal and is transcendental and is metaphysical and is non science and cannot be ‘taught’ but must be argued.
The Person is non sense (i.e. not a sense). The person is a subject. The person is ‘above’ the 5 senses, and is not an object like a thing or a tree. You are the sensor that senses the world through the five senses. I am I, and I am not an object or a ‘thing.’
‘I am a Person who thinks’ as opposed to ‘I think therefore I am’
Descartes argument was ‘I think therefore I am.’
This is not sense (science). Science is what we can know with the 5 senses.
We cannot put our head into our brain and bring out a thought.
The person thinks. However the person is not a thought. A thought cannot person; on the contrary only a person can think. I am a person, I am not a ‘thought’ or ‘thoughts.’ I am a person therefore I can think.
I am a person who thinks. I am not a thought that persons.
There can be no thought without a thinker. The thinker is the person.
I am a person. I exist. I think. ‘Thought’ does not ‘person.’
The Person is the Cause of reason and the reason is the effect.
We can go back to our childhood in our memory, but memory has to be commanded just as a database of photos have to be opened. Which memories do you want to look at? The Person has a memory that is like a video library of their life’s experiences, and this a 5 senses memory where you can imagine or ‘remember’ Seeing, Touching, Tasting, Smelling, Hearing, and in addition you can remember what is subjective such as your thoughts and feelings etc.
The Lost Cause of seeking empirical proof of the non-empirical.
Quantity and non sense. For example, consider:
I would like 25 kilos of thoughts (not a sense) and 2 pounds of tomatoes (sense). I would like 13 yards of Love (non sense), and a kilo of wheat (sense). I would like a gallon of ‘Person (the ‘I,’)(non sense) and litre of gasoline (sense)’ I want 20 ounces of Beauty (non sense) and a ton of cement (sense). I want a bottle of Faith, an ice cream, a bottle of Hope, a packet of crisps, and could you send a packet of ‘Injustice’ to the American Embassy in the Hannover Square?’ Further more, I want 152 yards of God (non sense), a pound of potatoes ( sense) and I want a gram of Satan (non sense), and do you have change for a $20 (sense).
Thus when we are asked for a ‘philosophical (scientific) proof’ of ‘God’ or God’s goodness, what we are asking for is evidence based on 5 senses language of what is beyond the five senses. We may as well ask for 25 kg of Love. The quest to ‘prove’ God’s existence philosophically is a quest for fool’s gold. We can only offer weak or strong arguments for God’s existence, since God is what is subjective and is an inner experience, not a sensual (i.e. physical) experience, for God is not a tree or a person’s leg. Even if we see one person out of 6 billion, we are not ‘seeing’ one sixth billionth of God, because all we see is an animated body and we cannot know the person’s mind.
‘Non Sense’ as Contradiction.
One reaction to this by those who have been hypnotised by Capitalist Newspeak (Babel), is to object to the term ‘God is non sense,’ but not to the term ‘God is metaphysical,’ however both terms mean the same.
Consider two statements.
1: God is non sense.
2: God is metaphysical
At first glance 1 and 2 appear to have a different meaning.
1 and 2 have exactly the same meaning but if Godists (Greek: theists), may on first glance consider 1 to be derogatory.
This is due to the Devil’s lie of Contradiction.
The Devil’s Argument Shop: Abuse and Contradiction.
A man goes into the Devil’s argument shop and pays $10 for an argument.
He goes into a room and the Devil is sitting there.
The man points to a Tree in the corner of the room, and says ‘This is a Tree.’ The Devil calls him a False, Evil, Liar, Satanic, Selfish, Illegal Person and screams abuse at him for several minutes. The man replies that he is a Good, True, Truthful, Godly, Selfless, Legal Person, and that the Devil could not possibly Judge him because had only just met him and he cannot Judge a person by his or her appearance. Is a saintly Godly, good person like a good mother who is good like God is good and who is not evil like Satan is evil, and who may look very ordinary and simple, any different in appearance from an demonic, evil, False, Evil, Liar?
Reducing the Language Matrix of 8 terms to Four Terms.
A: Sense Non sense.
B: True False.
C: Good Evil
D: Legal Illegal.
Can we simplify our list further with an Ockham’s Razor? Yes we can.
Ockham was a Christian philosopher who held that arguments should be as simple as possible. If we listen to a lengthy philosophical argument that goes on for an hour, we should be able to simply it down to a few sentences or one sentence or one word.
‘
Sense’ is all of philosophy. What is personal is what Judges good and evil.
On an aircraft flying over an unknown country with unknown laws, to the two philosophers, terms B, C and D from each column are synonymous, meaning the ‘same as.’ A lawyer may say that he can go to one of the many law libraries in the world and there are 1000’s of laws that he can be sure of with his five senses, however these laws did not fall out of the sky in a holy book; these laws were the subjective Judgment of the Legislature (Lawmakers), and in philosophy of Law (which is not a philosophy), what is legal ‘should’ be goodness (i.e. Communism) and what is illegal ‘should’ be evil (i.e. Capitalism).
A Capitalist in a Communist State will always be illegal, just as a Communist in a Capitalist State will always be illegal.
A good person (i.e. a Communist) is always True, speaks the Truth, is a Truthist (Hebrew: Nazarene), is Truthful and is legal and a non criminal, however if he lives in an evil (Capitalist) state, the good people, who are Communists like Yeshiva who curse the Capitalists and call for Revolution against them, for example, will always be illegal, and the Templar Satanist King and his molesters will always be protected from prosecution. This is irrelevant to Philosophy Island where the One Law is yet to be introduced.
We end up with four terms, Sense and Non sense and good and evil. Good is the same as True and Legal. Evil is the same as False and illegal. In practical Law, there are different laws in Cuba than there are in America. An illegal person in the Molest State (America) may be good and a legal person may be evil. However in philosophy this can be ignored.
As far as I am concerned, my words and edicts are Law, and thus Bush, Blair, Sharon and Moon are illegal and have long been sentenced to Death and Hell, however there is no reason, for example, why the American legislature (lawmakers) could not pass a law stating that if there are persons in the US government who are narco-terrorists and traitors, that these persons are not illegal. That is irrelevant to the discussion on philosophy of Law, on Philosophy Island which is anyway the same question as ‘What is good and evil?
Consider yourself on an aircraft sitting next to a philosopher, and as you travel around the world by plane, you discuss these 4 words. You are unconcerned about the thousands of laws of the many countries beneath you with regards to ‘What is legal and what is illegal?’ for in Philosophy of Law, what is legal and illegal must reflect what is the person’s position on ‘good and evil.’
While on the aircraft, you and the philosopher have a hypothetical debate on an imaginary desert island. You are stranded there with two other females. Now you have four philosophers, two male and two female.
On this island there would be no written laws, but the women may say that they want some laws that would protect them from the men in case the men were evil, since they have never seen the men before and since they are all naked and have no nuclear or bio weapons, they do not want to be tortured eaten and offered to Moloch, and they have no way of knowing if these men are cannibals (Freemasons) or not. What is clear is that Legal and Illegal are a subjective personal human Judgment of the woman who considers herself good and wants to be protected from evil. She may consider herself ‘good like Oh My God would be good,’ and her worry is that the men may be evil like the CIA narco-terrorists and their god Moloch is evil.
True and False. Only a person can be true or false
Only a person can be True, tell the Truth and be Truthful.
We will not find a fly or a cat that tells us the Truth. If we told a Tree to be True, tell the Truth and be Truthful, would we expect the same response as we would from a person? We cannot bring Trees into court and prosecute them, we only do that to a person. When a game show host says ‘The City of London is the home of Masonic narco-terrorists,’ and the game show host says ‘True or False?’ what the person means is ‘Am I telling the truth or am I lying to you? Is what I am saying true or false? Is there any truth in what I say or can it be shown to be False?’ A tree will never tell a lie or tell the truth. Only a person can make a False statement.
Subjective and Relative.
Subjective is not the same as ‘relative (related but different),’ though relative is often confused with ‘subjective.’ If there is only One God, and God is only ‘good’ then good is not relative (different) to God, if She is one, not three, or 3333. If I read Mien Kampf and a Nazi reads Mien Kampf, then he may say ‘True and good like God is good’ and I may say ‘False and Evil like Satan is evil,’ for if God Judged Hitler to be good, then God would be evil like Hitler was evil, but God cannot be evil, because we her children are good.’ We each reach different conclusions, but if there is only One Immanent God, good and evil are not different for different people; on the contrary, some people would be considered good and others evil, and yet they would both define as good and define evil differently.
Philosophy has no written law, and philosophy defines the limits of all certain knowledge in the world of the 5 senses, and the rest is subjective.
There is no 100% certainty in the future world of the Five Senses. Quantum Theory (theory of what the ‘quantity’ of an atom is) tells us that there is only future probability. The universe has not always been this way. It has been expanding for perhaps 15 to 20 billion years. We know this because we can take measurements. Why should the universe go on expanding? For all of human history, when we drop an object it falls down, not up, but the Universe could contract and pens could start to go up, or a black whole could appear and suck us into it. We can be more certain of what has been than what will be.
Marx’s claim that Materialism is scientific is a false claim.
Take the four following terms.
God exists or God does not exist
God is good or God is evil.
If I say that these are all metaphysical propositions, it is one matter, but if I say that they are non sense, then there is a tendency to think that ‘metaphysical’ sounds better than non sense, because non sense is often used as a contradiction.
If I point to a tree and say ‘This is a tree’ and someone says ‘non sense,’ then they are confusing sense with non sense. This can be very hypnotic.
We must understand the meaning of the terms sense and non sense or we cannot do philosophy and metaphysics.
Philosophy: Greek: Friend of Science. Philos: to know, to sense, knowledge, science.
To know or to sense is the same word Philos, in the Greek.
Children do not need to learn Greek, for the Greek terms in English are the language or the sophists (the sophisticated educated people) and philosophy is not the same as sophistry.
What we cannot know in language science, we cannot speak of as ‘sense’ or ‘physical.’ There is no evidence that can be produced from what is known by the 5 senses that can ‘prove’ that God exists or God does not exist.
The Term ‘Linguistic Philosophy’ and the term ‘5 Senses Language.’
Let
us simplify and replace the term Philosophy with the term:
5 senses Language.
Children can understand that better, or ‘sense’ for short.
Then we can say that the Greek term Metaphysics (above the senses or ‘above physics’) may be translated into the English term ‘non sense,’ or ‘Personalism’ and this has no ’thing’ (no object like a tree) to do with 5 senses language
All of philosophy is contained in the term ‘5 senses Language’
All of metaphysics is contained in the term ‘Person’
All the words that we speak must be examined line by line. When we speak in 5 senses language, we point at an object and say ‘This is a chair’ or the ‘Elephant is bigger than a truck but smaller than the Empire State building,’ or the ‘Water is Wet,’ or ‘I hear the birds,’ or ‘I smell the flower.’ We cannot Judge a flower to be evil. We only Judge others to be good like God should be, like I am, like most people are, and not evil like God should ‘not’ be and like all Capitalists and Religionists are.
The Argument for God’s existence from mathematics.
This is a very short argument and it is not a proof’ for there will never be sensory ‘proof’ for what is metaphysical, i.e., A gallon of ‘God,’ a 100 yards of Love or 10 kilos of Person, but we can have a pound of bananas, and we can prove that bananas exist.
Here is the argument.
There can be only One First Cause.
The most simple number in mathematics is the number 1.
The number 2 is a more complex number and it is composed of 1 plus another one. Where did that extra one come from?
Zero is inconceivable. We were not the cause of our own existence, and we believe that before we had any memories at all, before our birth into this world, that our mothers and grandmothers existed as persons.
What is Zero but nonexistence? Do we know (i.e. an object like a tree) of zero (no object like a tree and no subject like a person who is master of the 5 senses)?
Since it is impossible for us to experience our own non existence, and since the world of 6 billion persons is a fact, we know both scientifically (by our five senses) ‘and’ by our existence as persons who are masters of the 5 senses, that zero is inconceivable and not possible in our expanding universe. We cannot ‘know’ zero and we cannot ‘think’ of non existence as being the cause of our own existence. Our ancestors did not create their own eyes and stick them in their head and stick on 5 senses and glue them together with Araldite. Zero is ridiculous (worthy of ridicule).
The most simple number is the number one and any number more complex than one requires the addition of a new creation.
Rather than getting a blackboard and filling it with a great many mathematical formulas and offering a mathematical argument for God’s existence, the blackboard in this case would only contain one number. That would be 1.
There can be only One.
One God has promised to send One Christ not two; not a Communist Christ ‘and’ a Capitalist Antichrist, for the Templar Antichrist is the Devil’s slave and an impostor, not God’s Only Son.
All impostors must die.
The Argument for God’s existence from Design. The Argument for the ridiculousness of non theism.
We cannot know from the world of the 5 senses that God exists or does not. A Tree will not write essays questioning its existence and how it came to be and who was its Creator? Only a person does that. We cannot say that we ‘know with our 5 senses that God exists,’ we can only examine the evidence of the world and come to that conclusion.
William Paley’s ‘Design’ argument: The Watch.
Let us say that there is a man who is walking along a country lane and the man finds a Watch. This is a handmade watch, and one can see all the marks of the craftsman. Let us say that man was to say, ‘Oh this is an accident. This watch has no Creator. This just fell out of the sky, or it must have been formed in rock or it just ‘evolved.’ We would then say that this is ridiculous (worthy of ridicule).
The opposing argument.
The Devil in the argument (dialectic) shop will say that Paley had already seen watches before and that he had seen them being created by a Craftsman, and that even though Paley had never met the watch’s creator, he knew that such watches are only made in workshops by craftsmen. However Paley did not ‘See, Touch, Taste, Smell or Hear’ God create a human person with his five senses.
Richard Swinbourne’s Design Argument: The Fish Eye.
Swinbourne’s argument is essentially Paley’s argument applied to fish eyes. When we look at the fossil record all over the world, there was a period where all fishes were blind, and then suddenly, and in an evolutionary time scale, immediately, we see on the next level of the fossil record that the fish now have eyes (two video cameras) stuck on the front of their head, and there is the most incredible set of nerve endings (Television cables), that brings a moving image of the scene to a consciousness that assembles all the senses together to make sense of the world around it. We cannot discuss the existence of God, Satan and whether the soul is eternal or not eternal with a fish or a tree. A fish is not a person, but it is still a subject of its senses and it can tell its body which direction to swim in and so forth.
Swinbourne's argument is ‘stronger’ than Paley’s argument. Why? I am a person. I believe that if I had served an apprenticeship with a watchmaker, that after some years, that I could learn how to use those tools and instruments to take a pattern of a watch, and that I could cut out all the parts and assemble them. However if you asked me to make a fish eye and a subject of consciousness, and a brain with TV cables that never or rarely broke down and that required no TV repair engineer, then I would tell you that you are being ridiculous. If you give me a camera and a film editor, I can make you a film, and if I served an apprenticeship in Silicone Valley, I could learn scientifically how to turn sand into silicone into a digital film editor and I could edit you that film and I could probably learn scientifically to design video cameras, but if you asked me to make you a fish eye that would last for the life of the fish, and lubricate that eye and make sure that it does not stick in the socket, and that it would send a video of the fish’s surroundings to the subject of consciousness, and if you asked me to create that subject of consciousness, then I would tell you that you are being ridiculous (worthy of ridicule).
Further let us say that the watchmaker that made the watch was blind. How could he then make the watch? If it would harder for a Capitalist to enter Heaven than for a blind man to make a hand made watch, how much more so would it be for a blind person, to manufacture silicone, design and build a camera and a film editor, design its’ software, and shoot a film and edit it? Let us say that I could ask someone to talk me through it?
Who did the blind watchmaker have to talk Her through Creation?
If we look for a Personal God in the world of the 5 senses and we will never ever find Her. All we can do is argue and say, ‘ridiculous’ and ‘worthy of ridicule.’ The Argument from Design is a ‘strong argument,’ but there is one major critique against in this argument which is the problem of Evil.
The argument from our own existence as persons.
We have examined Swinbourne’s Fish Eye argument, Paley’s Watch and now we must examine Mars’ argument for Design, which is based on Mars, who is a person who is a good, true, truthful Truthist (Heb: Nazarene) who speaks the truth, just as I would expect God to speak the truth if She did not have me to speak for Her.
I am more than any fish eye; I am more than any watch.
Sometimes the most obvious is that which seems too obvious to be true.
I am the master of my five senses and they all work together very simply.
I can see, touch, taste, smell, hear all at the same time. I am a person who can draw upon a memory like a video hard drive that can recreate an image of all the memories of my life. Without that I would not be who I am; I would be a different person. My body can last over 100 years and when I have sex with another person, then from a tiny egg and a sperm another person me can be born with five senses, and the fully working film studio in their head will allow them to walk around and to experience the world with their 5 senses.
I can love, I can long for a better world. I can weep when I am sad and laugh when I am happy. All this runs not on nuclear power, but on some rice, wheat, fruit, water and items that taste very nice and appear not to be purposeless. I am not a mutation. I am perfect in every way. I am a miracle. I should not exist but I do. Could I have created my eye? There is as more chance of a monkey typing Shakespeare by hitting the keys at random than there is of Shakespeare typing a monkey into existence and there is more chance of that that there is of Light evolving accidentally into me. We are not matter, we are Light. We are Subjects. That is why we are like God and God is like us, for it would take an intelligent subject to create another subject. A cigarette lighter (i.e. an object) cannot create a child that runs and smiles and laughs. No ‘matter’ created this Universe and that is what we will forever be, for we are not matter, we are persons and persons are subjects like God who is good, not like a thing that is known to the senses, for a tree cannot create a person and a tree cannot be good or evil.
It is simply ridiculous to suggest that I am a mutation and that everyone in the world is a mutation. We are Created for Love and happiness, and we know that and yet the world is not like that.
The existence of a ‘person’ like a ‘child’ is more miraculous than any ‘thing.’ We do not need to point to things and say ‘Oh that must have a Creator’ when we can point to our self and others as persons and say ‘What is personal must have been created by what is personal.
Dawkins: The Problem of Evil: Is God blind or evil?
As Richard Dawkins would put it, ‘God must be a Blind Watchmaker.’ Richard looks out at the same world that I do, and that is the world where 300 million children are starving to death in the Capitalist’s Holocaust. The significance of the death of a fly and the deaths of 300 million children in the world, is not discussed in the champagne bars of the City of London and the Masonic Lodges. Richard cannot conceive of a God that would create a world with so much suffering.
Is God then evil, since there is incredible evil in the world created by God?
The French Anarchist and one time Freemason, Proudhon, declared that ‘God is evil.’ Marx dismissed this as an admission that God exists. Marx’s proposition was grounded in Feurbach’s ‘The Divine Being is nothing more than the Human Being’ anthromorphic (i.e. we create our own human like Deity which is like us) God who was a creation of the consciousness. Marx was more brutal in announcing the Death of God in the proposition ‘There is no God.’ If however God exists and God is evil, why are we good? Why are children born good? Why are most mother’s good and why do they sacrifice themselves selflessly for their children? Why do cars stop at a ‘Pelican’ Crossing and not merely mow down the children on the crossing that are slowing down the progress of the car?
I can say that I am good, therefore God is good; I have love therefore God must have at least the same Love or more Love. Is God as good as me or better than me; is God evil like Bush or good like me? If I am good, God cannot be evil, or why are all persons not evil? If God was evil all her children would be born evil and the Capitalists and Religionists would not need to hypnotise children to become evil. If God is evil why are not all children born as narco-terrorist demons such as Bush, Blair, Sharon and Moon, and if God is evil, why are there those who have declared eternal War against such demons?
We must deal with the problem of evil.
Why does God allow 300 million persons to suffer?
Why does She allow Bush, Blair, Moon and Sharon to even breathe?
Does
God care more about her suffering children than me, or less than me?
If she cares less than me, then She must be evil, therefore if She is good,
She must care either more than me or at least the same as me.
God does not seem to interfere with the laws of physics.
She does not command stones to become bread and feed the poor.
We have free will and if we did not have free will, we would not be persons. We can fight evil just as God would fight evil.
If God is good and the world is evil, then evil is not meant to be.
Why is it that it is unusual for children to grow up to be evil Usuryists, Templars and CIA/MI6 narco-terrorist collaborators? Why do not all children grow up to be collaborators with the devotees of Molest?
The
arguments for ‘Design’ do not ‘prove’ anything and they lead to the problem
of evil (ethics) and I will deal with this separately in the section on ‘Good
and Evil’ Island.
The argument for God’s existence from Quantity physics.
What is the ‘quantity’ (stuff, or thing’) of the universe?
A simple argument.
What
is a tree?
We know that a tree is not solid and that it is mostly empty space.
Let us say that the tree is made of molecules.
There is a molecule here X and over here X is another molecule.
Let
us say that the distance between the molecules is like the distance between
the earth and the sun, for the sake of comparison.
This is two very small Light particles with mostly empty space (ether) in
between.
But what is the molecule?
A molecule is just a term in language to describe a collection of atoms.
Let us say that we have an atom Y and over here Y is another molecule. In between them let us say that the distance is like the earth to the sun.
So what is the atom made of?
We say that the atom has a nucleus (which is either –ve +ve or neutral) and that it is surrounded by a particle wave.
Let us say that Z below is the neutron and that the lines represent the particle wave. The neutron is the Cause and the wave is the effect. The neutron is like the sun and the electron wave is like the heat of the sun, to use an analogy.
-----------------------------Z---------------------------------
So the question is, what is the neutron made of?
Q Q
Let us say that we have a Quark and a Quark, and that the distance between them is like the distance between the earth and the sun, in comparison to their size.
So what is a Quark made up of?
The problem that begins to occur is that the ‘size’ of what we are speaking of is so small that this cannot be measured or seen and in this area we now talk of ‘Theoretical’ physics.
So let us say that a quark is made of a sub quark and that a sub, sub quark is made of a sub, sub, sub quark, and that a sub, sub, sub, sub quark is etc., etc.
This is the same question as who created God’s great, great, great, great (to infinity) grandmother, or how many squares can be placed within a circle within a square within a circle etc. We know that the universe exists, but we cannot identify this First Cause since we can only ‘identify’ what appears in the world of the 5 senses. Similarly we know that a tree exists, but we cannot identify its ‘quantity.’
The more ‘solid’ or ‘hard’ an object appears, the closer the molecules are to each other and the less empty space (ether) there is in between the molecules, however no matter how hard an object is, most of the object is the empty space between the molecules, and a hard object may have a distance between the molecules like the earth to the sun and a less hard object may have a distance between the molecules like the Sun to the edge of the solar system.
It would appear that the even if we could locate the ‘root’ of matter, then by definition this would be that which is ‘not’ made up of anything smaller. What is not made up of something smaller is ‘no-thing’ for we know that everything that appears solid is made up of some-thing else. It is clear that the root of all matter is non matter and yet it is also clear that whatever it is, is existent; i.e. existent non matter. We exist as persons and yet a ‘person’ is not an object or a piece of matter, but a consciousness that is subject to all objects.
Thus statements such as ‘The universe is material,’ can no longer be considered scientific, since the basis of matter cannot be senses by the 5 senses and it never shall be any more than a kilo of Love can be sensed by the 5 senses.
The origin of matter.
The root of matter has to exist, but we cannot measure it or describe it.
We know that the universe exists, but we also know that it is mostly empty space.
If
we took out all the empty spaces between the atoms, we could crushed it down
to the size of a golf ball, as it may have been 20 billion years ago, when
it is said that the universe would have had the same quantity as has today.
Let us say that .00000000000000000000000001 of a second after the big bang (when the universe began to expand from no-thing) that the universe was the size of a golf ball, then what size was it a millisecond before that (half a golf ball?) and a millisecond before that (a quarter of a golf ball?)?
This is again the question of ‘Who created God’s grandmother?’ and mental gymnastics are required by the Sophists or materialism to explain that there the Universe came forth from a small piece of matter, smaller than a pin head, that weighed the same as the universe does to day.
There
is as very simple explanation for this and it is that the universe is not
material at all and that it never has been and never will be. This is not
solipsism (the universe is an illusion). I exist as a fact. The Universe is
created from Light and Light was designed by God for a purpose that was to
allow is to see with our eyes. The Universe of Light was created for the human
eye.
The person is a subject not a thing like a tree. My consciousness is not material
but it exists. The root of matter is not material, it is non material (metaphysics)
and yet it exists. The origin of the universe in the spilt second prior to
the big bag cannot have been material.
The chances of the universe turning out the way it has by pure accident, is incalculable. There is more chance of a monkey creating a typewriter by shaking a few pieces of rock with metal ore within them. The universe is a product of Design and its Grand Designer would have to be the greatest Physicist, chemist and biologist. It cannot be ‘proven’ that God exists or God does not exist or that God is good or that God is evil, for proof requires scientific falsification, and God does not speak to us out of the trees and the rocks, but though Her oppressed children’s cries for Justice and Liberation, God is always speaking to us, just as the Devil speaks to us through his servants who are the rich and the religious.
The argument fro God’s existence from Physics is a strong ‘argument’ which merely states that it is ridiculous (worthy of ridicule) to think that the Universe has no Creator.
If we say that the origin of the Light of the Universe and of all 6 billion children is an ‘object’ like a rock or a tree or a tiny piece of matter, then this is worthy of ridicule. A watch or a video camera cannot design and create a person with 5 senses, but a person can design and create a watch or a video camera for a specific purpose.
The origin of all Light is a person. God is personal, just as Her children who are created in Her image and likeness are personal.
There can be Only One.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The Argument for God’s goodness from a ‘new born baby.’
If God is evil, why are not all children born evil?
This is just a simple one line argument and no explanation is required.
The Argument for God’s existence and the existence of the realm of the ancestors from the Personal Experience (gnosis) of others.
When we consider the trial of Joan of Arc and the trial of Yeshiva, what we see are two persons, both of whom claim to have received Revelations and spiritual experiences, who were called into court to ‘prove’ these experiences. Joan was uneducated and could not read or write and had to explain herself to educated Satanists. When one considers the sheer impossibility of ‘proving’ any subjective experience whatsoever, then what we can say is that if a person is innocent until proven guilty, it is up to the court to disprove such spiritual experiences and revelations, and this is as impossible as ‘proving them,’ for what is beyond the 5 senses cannot be proven or disproved with 5 senses language.
The Argument for the existence of God and the realm of the ancestors is two-fold. In the first place, according to the American CIA propaganda magazine ‘Newsweek’ 95% of Americans are theists and 60% report that they have received ‘spiritual experiences’ and Revelations. This is merely an ‘argument’ that would state ‘this is common’ whereas atheism is peculiar and uncommon, though this is not to say that non theists are evil, for many non-theists are good, and by my Judgment all religionists without a single exception that I can think of, propagate evil. Since I cannot experience what others experience, I have no idea what those persons experiences, asides from reading their testimony. However from studying the testimonies of others, I can deduce that my own experiences, Revelations and visions are a ‘common’ phenomenon that millions of other persons, both in the past and present also report experiencing.
The Argument for God’s existence and the existence of the realm of the ancestors from my own Personal Experience (gnosis).
If Spiritual experiences, dreams, revelations and visions, are an indication of ‘goodness’ then Crowley, Hitler, Moon, the Capitalist Christians and many other evil spiritualists would have to be considered ‘good,’ however this is not so. Such experiences have nothing to do with whether a person can be Judged good or evil, and one may only switch on the US God Channel to see that such experiences are common to those devoted to pure human evil and Capitalism in the name of a Jewish Communist. Consider also the spiritual experiences and testimonies on www.deathandhell.com of the Satanic realist (i.e., who holds that one can have a personal spiritual relationship with Satan) Infek and his associates. Many of the most evil people in human history (such as Moon, Hitler and the Antichrist) report such spiritual experiences, and my own father is absolutely not an atheist; on the contrary he and his cultists have merely chosen to set themselves up as the sworn historical enemy of God and the children of God. Evil knows that God exists within and it has perfect faith in that and it does not doubt it instead rebels against the immanent God and allies its soul with the transcendent Master who makes demands of his slaves, as it was with Crowley, who allegedly sacrificed 1000’s of children (assuming that the ‘Frater’ that he referred to was his own pseudonym as has been alleged by Masonic cultists on the Internet), and according to one of his unofficial biographers, was commanded by his demon to make human sacrifices in order to gain more spiritual power.
If I merely relate my lifetime of metaphysical experiences, these would be totally subjective and improvable, just as it is with some of the most evil men in human history such as Moon, Hitler, Crowley, Billy Graham and the Masonic Antichrist, etc.
I have never had a single moment in my life when I have ever considered atheism, since my inner experience of life from birth until now would make no sense. Dreams, Revelations and visions can be intensified and brought on by the use of psychoactives such as Skunk or Sensimelia Marijuana, Psilocybine and the CIA’s favourite, LSD. These are totally subjective and personal experiences.
There is only One God. There is a Devil who is Grand Master of Hell in the afterlife. Our ancestors did not die at the point of death, but their souls live on the other side of the light and they can be intuited, however since they do not have a mouth in this world to speak, they cannot speak to us in human language and that is why no spiritualists can walk into a room and tell each person what their mother’s maiden name was unless we guess.
Personal experience convinces only ourselves and not others, however that is as it should be, for it is the One God who knows us best and whom ewe spend eternity with. We may be totally alone, but we are never alone for we always have the immanent God within and we always have Heaven and Hell who watch over us, some for evil and some for good.
Why we must only pray in Silence alone in a Dark Room.
We are constantly watched from birth to death by the hosts of Heaven and Hell, and there is not a single thing that we can ever do in secret whether in the dark or underground or in the light where we can hide from the 5 senses of our ancestors. Our only way of separating from all this is to go into a dark room, close the door, remain totally immobile and silent and pray to the immanent God in silence and She shall answer us and if we seek the Truth we shall find it and if ask it shall be opened and if we knock it shall be answered, however we cannot impose our own will on the Mother of the 6 billion children, for She has too many problems and She experiences too much suffering. Instead we must place our soul in absolute total submission to the One immanent God and ask Her what Her will is not our will.
When we pray we can pray thus:
Lead the world not into Temptation but deliver us from evil and send us your armies of deliverers for the Day of Judgment
Your will be done on earth as it is in Heaven, not my will.
How do we bring your kingdom on earth that this world may be your kingdom and power and glory forever and ever?
And
praying thus we must ask God for guidance.
If we do our own will, She will abandon us, for only Satan does his own will
and disregards all others. We must offer our souls to God and to Heaven.
There is nothing to be gained for ourselves. There is only sacrifice. There is only War ahead. First evil must be defeated and annihilated. Then and only then shall peace come.
First there shall be War of Armageddon against the Templar Usuryists and narco-terrorists, for they are the Greatest enemy of God and the children of God in all of human history, and their Holocaust is the property of human history and of God and Heaven.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
God is more than the sum of all things. A formula for God.
If
we could point to a kilo of God and say ‘That is God’ then it would not be
God. If God is only ‘every-thing’ then God would only be the Summa (Sum or
‘total’ or totality) of all things (all objects) and we could devise a finite
mathematical formula for this of:
God = all things (impersonal objects),
and this would be impersonal like a rock or a tree is personal, not like a person who is a subject. If God is an impersonal ‘thing’ (like a tree), then we do not need to say that God = all things (impersonal objects) + 1, since if God is a thing, then that thing would be included when we say ‘all things’
The Sum of all things and persons, plus One person.
If
God is every existent non-thing (i.e. persons), then She would be the ‘Total
Sum of all persons Plus One (Herself) and we could say that God is ‘the Sum
of all persons plus One’. If God is every-thing (objects that can be known
with the 5 senses) and every existent non-thing, plus every existent non-thing,
we could devise a Formula of:
’ God = (sum of all things (objects)) + (sum of all persons) + One Person (Herself).’
This is the formula for God and it is both scientific and personal (i.e. physical and metaphysical). What is physical is impersonal, and we can ‘prove’ and have ‘certain knowledge’ of (through the 5 senses or science)’ and what is metaphysical we can argue before other persons and seek to convince other persons of, since this is personal.
To use an analogy, we could say that the Universe is like the ‘body’ of God, and that all persons are like the mind of God. If we say that God is immanent (within all persons and things) but that God is all persons plus One, this is not to say that she is ‘separate’ from us. Another person is ‘separate from me (transcendent or ‘beyond’ and can be ‘transported’ some-where else).’ If God is immanent then She cannot separate from us at any time, since it is an ontological (what She is) matter, just as a person cannot separate themselves from their thought. However, if God existed before there were any persons, then she must have her own sense of person and Her own memories.
If God is transcendent, as the Devil’s servants claim, then She is neither immanent (within) in all things and She is not immanent within us (all persons) and She could never hear a silent prayer and never know our thoughts, and we would have to pray in public as the hypocrites (Satanists) do to their False Father.
The Questions of Philosophy and Metaphysics: A summary thus far.
All answers begin with a question.
We cannot answer the questions of philosophy and metaphysics unless we fully understand all the questions.
There are only two questions.
1: What can we certain of? i.e., What is sense and what is non sense. Sense is scientific, non sense is always personal. i.e. 100 Yards of string and an evil person, but not 100 yards of person and an evil string .
Children
must be able to tell what is sense from what is non sense.
Sense is objective and can be falsified.
2: What is a Good person and an Evil Person?
This is a subjective moral Judgment for us all. For they who are in a cult, they surrender Judgment to the Grand Master of the cult, and for they who consider the words and edicts of Yeshiva to be the words of the Creator and abandon all for the Revolution against the rich, then they surrender Judgment to him.
The Devil’s Advocate (Lawyer).
A powerful form of argument is that of the Devil’s advocate. This involves taking the opposite side in order to make an argument for your own Judgment, by making ridiculous arguments that appear to be against you but that are for you.
This is a ‘reverse’ argument,
An example of a Reverse argument.
The Whore of the Church of England and the infallible edicts of her Communist Christ.
‘Consider:
‘Freely you have received, freely give, provide neither gold, nor silver, nor brass in your purses. Nor bag for your journey, neither two coats, neither shoes nor servants (Greek: servants and slaves are the same word)’ Mt 10 / 7.
Let us consider the Head of the Church of England, Elizabeth Windsor. Let us say that when Elizabeth was born, she was totally naked. I suspect that after her birth, it is just possible that she was clothed in a single robe, carried no bag, freely gave and freely received, and had no gold, nor silver, nor brass, for she would be too young to carry a purse. Some may argue that from the moment that she was born she was already a billionaire; after all this is the last 200 Years of the Chinese opium trade and the history of Imperialism and Usury. The Queen loves the poor very much. She wants to help the homeless. She wants the Financial Mafia and the Templar/Zionist to sell them more and more heroin and cocaine in order that they can be turned into prostitutes, to rich old Capitalists men that are evil. So what I am going to suggest is this. The parable of the Camel and the eye of a needle, is a reference to the rich. What I am going to suggest is a reprinting of the Bible that states ‘It shall be easy for the rich to enter Heaven, but Camels and the victims of the Capitalists (the poor), shall not enter Heaven; only rich hypocrites such as Elizabeth and her First Minister shall enter Heaven.’ In order to take up ones cross, one must have many shoes, many robes, live in a palace, collaborate with Usuryists and CIA/MI6 narco-terrorists, live off the wealth of narco-slavery, allow the rich to build Baal Groves to Moloch, and do all this is done in Yeshiva’s name. We could re-edit the entire Bible and we could sell indulgences for exclusions from hell for the rich persons. All their past and future sins would be forgiven for a price in gold. This new Bible would be revised. It would now say, ‘It shall be easier for a Camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for the poor to enter Heaven, and that rich person XXX was guaranteed a place in Heaven, and whoever came up with the money would have their name inserted into the new official Bible. We could let George, Blair, Moon and Elizabeth get their names in first. On that day when the New Bible came out, George, Elizabeth, Tony and the Korean Dragon would have their dream come true, they would announce that they were now officially Christians and that in the past they had been evil hypocrites, terrorists and paedophile cult collaborators, but now that they were officially in the Bible, they had the divine authority of the Jewish Communist martyr, and could go back to selling heroin and cocaine to the poor and continue the testing of depleted Uranium on Iraqi children, all in the name of Yeshiva.
This is a reverse argument and the purpose is not to convince anyone that this is true; on the contrary the purpose is to mock, ridicule and to bring Judgment, since what defines Yeshiva as different to other theists of his age is that he was good because he was ‘not’ a Capitalist or private propertyist.
The ‘Reverse Argument’ like this is a way of ‘falsification,’ which can be falsified by other persons. When a good person laughs and bobs their head up and down, they are laughing in agreement and giving a physical sign for words that would express,’ Yes that is so true.’ When we say something evil, that people do not agree with, such as ‘George Bush is a good, true, truthful, person just like God is good’ then people may laugh then use the language of sign by shaking their head from side to side, which is a universal sign in almost every country in the world for ‘No, No No.’ This is often accompanied by the waving of ones finger or hand from side to side.
When we laugh we know the truth, when everyone else in the room laughs. This is a form of falsification. Only a person can offer a False Evil Lie. Only a person can tell the truth.
When we see a tree, and we point to it and say ‘This is a tree,’ and other persons see the same tree and can describe its size, this means that we are not hallucinating and that it objectively exists.
If we speak of good and evil, since the majority of the people of the world are good, we have to convince the majority of the people in the world that our definition is similar to theirs.
A complex confusing argument like ‘Queen Elizabeth will go to Heaven, because sometimes she wears no shoes and is really an Anarchist Communist’ is funny to good people because we know that it is not true, and we are making a point that is the opposite of the point that we really seek to make. The kind of torturous arguments that suggests that Yeshiva was a ‘Propertyist’ and a ‘Usuryist collaborator’ just like the Queen and the Archbishop of Canterbury are, that is implied in the Church of England, subtly hypnotises people into language blindness, so that the term ‘good’ can be applied to the Head of the Church and the term evil can be applied to anti-monarchists such as Yeshiva; thus Christianity becomes the antithesis of C attacks on the monarchists and priests. If Elizabeth considers the words and edicts of first century lawbreaker who had a reward of thirty pieces of silver on him, to be the words of God, perhaps if a good person within her military collected the one US dollar reward I have on her, for anyone who gives her a quick Masonic T.C.A. (Throat Cut Across), she would feel more like the Communist Jew. What we are saying is, ‘this is worthy of ridicule;’ i.e., this is ridiculous. This is how we falsify personal moral Judgments with others, by testing if our arguments are weak or strong. It is possible that the ‘give all your money to the poor and have no possessions’ was a mistranslation of the ‘lend all your money to the poor, sell them heroin and the slavery of Capitalism in the name of anti-Communism and demand religious freedom to they who offer children to Molest?’ Somehow I do not think so.
Mass Hypnotism and the Devil’s language (Babel).
In order to demonstrate how Hitler, Bush, Moon, Blair and Sharon use mass hypnotism, I shall have to speak Babel.
When I speak Babel, children will not understand what I am saying, and they who speak Babel, such as the Templars and many other cultists will find it very comforting, for what I am going to do is to demonstrate how to confuse the intelligence by speaking Babel. Hitler spoke very good Babel, and Bush, Sharon, Moon and Blair are experts at Babylon’s language.
I have heard Babel spoken for years in Scotland. It is the second language of Scotland and it is the language of the City of London and the Americans have adopted it also.
Before the hypnotism begins, we need to meditate on Hitler, Bush, Moon, Blair and Sharon.
Remember that this is designed to allow you to hear what the Babylonian language is. The is Satan’s language, and to learn it, you only need to redefine 4 words and other words that mean the same, then you will either become totally confused and hypnotised, or you can confuse and hypnotise others if you are evil.
For example: The total confusion of meaning.
(BEGIN HYPNOTISM) Have Hitler, Bush Moon, Blair, and Sharon been talking true sense or nonsense, or have any of them been speaking falsely about what was good, or saying good things about what was false? Are they illegal, but good, false persons who speak non sense at times and sense at other times? Are they Satanic or Godly or both, and could it be that they are really true good persons but they are just illegal, or it is possible that they are false but still good and perhaps only sometimes Satanic …..(END)
Now that your brainwashing session is over, I must point out that the previous passage was total confusion, however this is Babel and the four most important terms to confuse are good and evil, sense and non sense, and that is why children must learn the meanings of these terms.
Moral Confusion.
Could a person ‘initiate an action’ that was evil, good, evil, good?
A person could make a 100 propositions of good and evil, and a 100 statements of pure sense (neither good nor evil but factual) and only one of the statements on good and evil might be evil. Hitler, Bush, Moon and Blair have depended upon the confusion of the 4 terms and the many words that have the same meaning at good and evil.
Consider the mass hypnotist who mesmerised and bewitched the intelligence of the Germans
The Great Temptation of the Great Deceiver, Hitler.
Consider:
1:
‘ The German people must have good motorways and architecture.’
A motorway cannot be good or evil, only a person can be good or evil, but by using the term good to refer to an ‘object’ and not a subject, he relates what is good to what is scientific.
2: ‘It would be good if all Germans had a Volkswagen and a transistor
radio.
Same again; a car or a radio cannot be good or evil, only a person can be good or evil, but again there is link between what is good and what is scientific.’
That was the Devil’s Temptation, now the price.
‘3: The German people are good, and are superior. The Jews and the Communists are the enemy of the good German people, and they are moral inferiors.’
How can Germans be good just because they were born in a certain part of the world or because their appearance is different to others? This is attributing ‘good’ which is personal and subjective, to what is scientific (i.e. persons of a certain appearance who live in Germany). This is defining what is scientific as good, however what is scientific is neither good not evil, only a person can be good or evil.
When the Jews and Communists are mentioned, it is against this background
of a definition of good that has been associated with what is scientific,
however good and evil are never scientific.
As we can see, this is not the argument of a philosopher; this is the argument of a mass hypnotist. The Pied Pieper always offers free ice cream in order to tempt you into slavery.
When you have more than one hypnotist in a room, such as Blair and Bush, Moon and Sharon, do they hypnotise each other or do they know each others tricks? As evil knows its own, so do such liars know their own.
What I want to do is to lift the curtain and allow the children of humanity to have the advantage in debate with they who are hypnotised. Winning the War of Language is the first stage in victory in real war.
Redefinition of God as Satan, Satan as God, good as evil and evil as good, and ‘good’ as utility.
These terms may be used repeatedly in order to hypnotise. If we take the example of CIA narco-terrorist collaborators such as the criminals and traitors, Bush and Blair, although they overtly evil, they want people to consider them as ‘good’ and so they use such terms as ‘good’ and ‘God,’ and since most persons hold that God is good, the masses are then hypnotised by confusion into accepting Bush and Blair’s definition.
Let us say that that Bush, Moon, Blair and Sharon are among the most evil persons in human history, there is still nothing to stop them using the terms ‘God’ and ‘good’ in their language, even though they are evil and not good like God, and are responsible for the current Capitalist Holocaust of the poor. They are evil like Satan but when they use terms ‘God’ and ‘good’, these terms are above science, and as such it is a question of arguing, deceiving, contradicting, throwing out abuse, confusion and using the term ‘good’ to refer to themselves and as a scientific term; i.e., as if it can be proved by the 5 senses, when it cannot.
If George wants Iraq as a testing ground for his weapons and for future campaigns, and he wants the oil, then anything that he does and anyone that he kills is killed with a ‘good,’ (i.e. ‘good’ as utility, or ‘usefulness) motivation as far as he is concerned, since it would be ‘good’ (useful) to get the oil.
If narco-terrorist collaborators such as Blair, Bush, the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Whore of Babylon have to be seen in a Church whose ‘theology’ considers the words and edicts of Yeshiva to be that of Infallible God, then it is all ‘good’ (useful) propaganda, for Bush’s ‘good’ (useful) campaign to get ‘good’ (useful) oil. This is the confusion of good as utility (usefulness) with ethics (good and evil). What Bush means is that it would be useful if he got the oil, just as it is useful to have billions of dollars in your bank account. Let us say that I said, ‘This is a good (useful) table, and this is a good (useful) pen and this war against Iraq and the Palestinians is good (useful) like Bush’s evil God is good (useful) to Bush, just as Bush is good (i.e., a useful idiot) as far as Satan (the god of Capitalism) is concerned.
Thus in language science each word and each proposition and each sentence must be analysed, and this can be learned, and it is not a skill.
The Language Matrix. Common words for Sense and Non sense.
All the words in the same column in the same grid mean the same.
Common
terms used by liars and seek to confuse, prove and convince
Also used by Truthists who see to clarify, prove and convince.
_____________________________
The world of objects, The world of persons.
_____________________________
Evident or Non evident
A Proof or An Argument
Provable or Arguable
Language science or Language of persons
Physics or Metaphysics (above physics)
Science or Non science
Sense or Non sense (not a sense)
5 Senses language or Non five senses language
certain or uncertain
objective or subjective
object or subject
Knowledge or Thought
Empirical or Non empirical
Evident
and or Non eviden
I do or
I think
I know or I believe.
How
do ‘you’ know? or Why
do ‘you’ believe?
______________________________
So we can see how these words can easily be confused. If, for example, we say that we are ‘certain’ of what is uncertain, then it is clear that this is contradictory, like non existent existence, but if we say that we are certain of what is metaphysical, or that we have a provable thought or say that something is empirically uncertain, none of this can be true, but it sounds more convincing to those who are confused by language, and thus do the meaning blind Sophists confuse others and we can end up speaking as they who speak Babel (the Sophists do), by attemting to copy their meaningless langauge, and thus do the hypnotised become the hypnotisers.
The Language Matrix. Common words for good and evil.
Moral Judgment of a person.
______________________________
Good or Evil
True or False
Truth or Lies
Truthist or Liar
Truthful or Untruthful
Honest or Dishonest
Selfless or Selfish
Godly or Satanic
Angelic or Demonic
Legal or Illegal
Criminal or Non criminal
Moral or Immoral
or
______________________________
Any
of the above can be argued
One cannot have proof (knowing) of what is personal.
One can only seek to ‘convince’ (confidence) by argument. ‘Good’ (as in moral) argument seeks to convince and evil argument ‘cons,’ which is to say that it convinces but that it is evil.
To test our arguments we would have to see if all 6 billion persons have any confidence in the arguments. We can do this in an imaginary philosophy room where representatives of the world are gathered, however only 10% would be from rich Capitalist states and 90% would be poor. Arguments must convince the majority that the minority are evil liars who are evil like George Bush not good like me.
The Method of Falsifying Good and Evil.
There is a methodology of testing subjective (personal) arguments on other persons, i.e., other subjects, not objects like a tree, for you cannot test an argument for Judgment on a tree, you can only test it on a person, and they must be dehypnotised first and they must be told the general rules of what is sense and non nonsense, contradiction and abuse.
If we devise a machine that gives out more electricity than it takes to power it (a perpetual motion device), then we need to get other persons to test the results to make sure that they get the same phenomenon. That is science. In the question of what is good and evil, we have no objective criteria to test that against; we have only other persons.
The Island of ‘Philosophy and the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil?’
A Philosophy Island is where philosophers and metaphysicians can test their theories. This is a purely metaphysical fantasy island that we go to in our imagination to test our arguments, and if we so wish we can have all the philosophers of history on the island, and the island will be governed by no nation’s law or government. We shall take a sample of 100 people from all parts of the world, all ages, both sexes, and we would try to make it as representative as possible, but we shall invite many philosophers, politicians and religionists to attempt to convert the population to Capitalism (Satanism) or Communism (Godism).
_________________________
A Population Map of the Island of Philosophy and the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil
___________________________
Out
of 6 billion persons, we need only 100 persons who are representative of the
masses.
A third or the earn between zero and $1.50 a day
Half are male and half are female.
__________________________
The Economic background of the population.
The Island must include approximately the following people:
____________________
A: The Third Word: 33 degrees of a 100.
5 who are starving.
28
who are under the UN poverty level
____________________
B: Middle Earth: 56 degrees or a 100.
56 who are the poor.
____________________
C: The First World: 11 degrees of a 100.
The Dark Lord’s (The Antichrist) Kingdom.
10 from the Capitalist states
1 who is of the super rich
___________________________
The Regional Background of the population
18 would be from China
18 would be from the Indian subcontinent
10 would be Russian or Eastern European.
10 would be European and American
10
would be African
10 would be from South and Central America
15 would be from East Asia, Japan Malaysia, Indonesia, Korea, Australia
9 would be from the ‘Middle East,’ Turkey, Iran, Iraq, Israel.
_________________________
The
Ages of the population
17 would be aged one month to aged 8
18
would be aged 8 to 16
33 would be 16 to 35
33 would be 35 to 70
_________________________
The
Religions of the population
20 would be from ‘regions’ (i.e. not religions) that are predominately Christian.
20
would be from regions that are predominately Muslim.
20 would be from regions that are Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist.
40 would have no particular religion or have a different religion to the above.
_____________________________
The Laws of the Island
On this Island there would be no money, no private property, no clothing but
there would be an abundance of water, food and fish.
There would be no Laws until such laws are created by the consensus of the 100 persons.
_____________________________
The Anarchist Model
This is the ideal. This is what we seek to test.
It is with such a community that we have to test our moral (Good and Evil) and political (lawful and unlawful) Judgments, and how we can ensure that communityism and Economic Paradise prevails.
1: The ‘Transcendent’ God (Satan) is evil (no religion).
2: Anarchy is Order (no government).
3: Property is Theft (collectivism).
4: We are good therefore God is good (no original sin)
5: God is immanent (we are the image of God)
6: God is a Communist (God is not a Capitalist; i.e., ‘evil’).
7: God is a Mother (The women are the more ‘divine’ gender’).
8: All persons are equal and have an equal right to food and resources
____________________
The Capitalist model.
If we use the example of the world today, then if the Island resembled Capitalism, we would find the following.
5 who continue to starve.
28 would never have enough food but have to work.
56 who are the subsistence labour slaves and who will have enough food.
10 would enjoy the fruits of the labour of all other slaves but would have to work in the servant of the king
1 who is of the super rich; he would be king and only he would have
the power to issue money.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Different models of the Island.
In order to test how we can move from Capitalism to Communism and to test our arguments on this island, those who are starving could continue to be starved and enslaved by the Capitalists, and they who are from the Capitalist states could continue to have an abundance of food. The fairness of this would be debated by the majority, and strategies for Violent Revolution and the Holocaust of the richest 10% considered. Alternatively we could allow all persons to have the same food and to have either one robe, or all persons could be naked. Thus we can devise a number of different scenarios that we could test.
The’ reality’ TV shows of the Capitalist states offer a practical opportunity to view how persons live in Economic Equality. When the participants are divided into rich and poor, the children who are poor resent the situation and consider it to be unnatural. All children want to be equally loved by their Mother and expect an equal share of whatever food is available to their mother. We see that even when the contestants are divided into have-more and have-less categories, even when they who represent the poor have adequate food, they still resent the division between rich and poor
Final Solutions and Revolution.
How do we get out of this situation and reach Economic Paradise:
The
Economy of the Capitalist Island
Slavery.
10 persons would enjoy the fruits of the labour of all other slaves but would
have to work in the service of the king’s government, banking military and
police. One person would be of the super rich; he would be king and only he
would have the power to issue money, and he would be the head of the island’s
religion and representative of the Island’s god. His words and edicts would
serve as Law, but he would be totally above even his own law.
Private
property.
This is a Capitalist Island. What we see is that the real criminal is the king.
He issues money by writing on a price of paper and signing it. He and his elite do the least amount of work and he and his 10% own all the land. If anyone on the island no longer wants to work for the king, the person has to buy a piece of land from the king’s flatterers and take out a mortgage. This mortgage would be repaid by harvesting food, selling it to other children for the king’s paper, and giving back half of the paper to the king in order to repay the mortgage.
Issuing
too much paper.
If the king issues too much money and the same amount of goods are available, there is inflation. If the king issues too little money, there is deflation. It does not matter how much or how little money the king issues, if the amount of food and items for sale on the island remains the same, the same people with the money receive the same share of the items and food, however to get food, one must work for the king for paper.
Unemployment.
Those who are unemployed are forbidden to grow food anywhere on the kings land, since certain areas are reserved as a national park and a golf course for the king, and the poor are forbidden to go fishing, since the king owns all the fishing rights.
False Democracy and Unfair Elections.
The king allows the 10% who are rich to vote for their own Prime Minister who is the puppet of the king. The rich are above the law and the poor are subject to the law.
Prisons, executions and terrorism.
A prison system is developed in order that ‘food thieves,’ ‘poachers of the king’s game,’ ‘terrorists’ who threaten the king and the kings government and religion, and they who fish illegally can be tortured, executed, imprisoned and punished.
Religion and the King’s Salvation.
The king’s religion. The king knows that if he chooses a God that is a rich evil Capitalist like the king is a rich evil Capitalist, that the poor people will never be fooled by that, so he decides to use an anti-Capitalist martyr, Yeshiva, whom the poor people who have come to the island have heard of. The poor are assured that if they love the king who is Yeshiva’s representative, that after death, they will be able to go to Heaven with the king. Of course, if the rich are evil and are to be sent to Hell and the poor are the victims, this begs the question of who exactly are these rich people who will go to Hell, since all the rich people on the island claim to have the authority of the king and the King’s God, Yeshiva.
The Evil of Private Property. All Property is Theft.
By looking at the two models, it is clear to me that if we take an Ockham’s razor to this, that the problem is firstly that of private property.
The people may complain about the king’s government, money, religion and God. The king may promise that the island will not always be this way, and that there will come a day when everyone has more money, however the problem is not that of money. If the island produces more fish, food, and items for sale, the king can decide to raise the wages of the 10% rich, and although there is now more money in circulation, the poor have the same amount of money as before, and the 10% rich who have more money can buy up all the extra goods.
Poverty is violence.
Out of 100 persons on the island there are the following who are the oppressed:
5 who are starving.
28 would never have enough food but have to work.
56 who are the subsistence labour slaves and who will have enough food.
84% are enslaved of which 28% are very poor.
The poorest persons on the Island are the women and children.
Solutions.
1: A new evil Religion.
What if we gave the 85% a new religion, built them a Temple and gave them some kind of new special ceremony that would not address the issue of private property and would consider ‘evil’ to be something that poor people are born with; i.e., original sin.
2: State Capitalism. We could overthrow the king, eradicate the 10% rich, but still use the same money system as the king. Whereas the king had issued all the money and the 10% rich got the greatest share, and the land and the fishing rights were owned by the king, now the State Capitalist government owns all the land and issues all the money. However 10% of the people are required to run this government, and these people were among those who were once poor. Same old, same old. All the Communist slogans could be brought out such a ‘all property is theft’ and meanwhile the government nationalises all property on the island and now the government owns all property and becomes the new thief instead of the king.
3: Anarchist collectivism and Feminist Revolution.
We could overthrow the king and return to year zero. There would be no government and there would be no private property. No person on the island could say that they had fishing rights or that they owned land. There would be no money, no barter, no trade. The Island would exist as a community like one family and all males would be disarmed and all females would carry a rod of iron to prevent counterrevolution.
Law
on the Anarchist Island
Now we are living in a pure Anarchist Island. This is paradise. Everyone has food, shelter and the security of the island’s children is entrusted to all females on the island who shall be armed. If a crime occurred on the Island against one of the children, all women could meet together in a forum and discuss the issue, and all women would consider themselves responsible to investigate the matter. If there was a trial, all women would be able to vote and all women would be the jury.
They must never give in to the temptation to elect a tyrant or a republican government. All monarchies start with one tyrant. All Republics start when a few are elected to rule over the many and when a military coup occurs such as the coup of the Templar Usuryists in the US and the UK, this can occur covertly without all of the population knowing about it as the case in the real world today.
Pure Democracy. The rule of the Rabble?
A pure democracy where even the males could vote on issues would be the ‘rule’ of the rabble, and before long the males would be in control again. It is the meek (the women) who are to inherit the earth, not the inferior gender (the males) who are merely the Economic slaves of all women.
Consumerism.
On such an island there would be no need to wear clothing, for there is no clothing that is more beautiful that the body. If there was another Island far to the North that was cold, the people on the warm island would think that was ‘Hell’ and that such unfortunate people had to spend part of their labour making jeans, T shirts and coats.
There would always be the temptation for the people on the cold island to want more than one T-Shirt and one coat. They could approach the population of the poor island and ask them to set up a sweat shop in order to make cotton T shirts. Thus we can see that Paradise would be under threat and that an economic counterrevolution was occurring.
Two Islands. One Capitalist and One Collectivist (anti-propertyist).
What
we could do is to set up two islands, one would be a collectivist economic
paradise with no kings and no government where all women could meet and discuss
agriculture and how best to use their labour slaves (the males).
The other would be a male Capitalist society run along the lines of today’s
present world, were the women are enslaved to the males and where there is
starvation.
The Capitalist on the Anarchist Island
The Capitalist state would be a tyranny of the minority, and the Anarchist Island would be run for the benefit of all persons. There is no such a thing as the tyranny of the majority, for to have tyranny one must have a tyrant. If for example, one placed a Capitalist on the Anarchist Island and an Anarchist on the Capitalist Island, the Capitalist on the Anarchist Island would find that her king’s pieces of paper were worthless; she could not buy land, she could not buy food and she could not enslave anyone. There would be an abundance of food and there would be community meals and there would be no question of buying any form of private property; she would have shelter, and she could choose her own lovers and friends; if she walked around the island she would find that there was no rich and poor and no good and evil, for all persons were good in this paradise. There was no need to steal anything for there was nowhere to hide anything or to ‘keep’ anything, and there was no need for clothing or jewellery etc.
The Anarchist on the Capitalist Island
If the Anarchist was sent to the Capitalist Island, she would find that there were a few rich people and many slaves, including a third of the Island that were very poor, and that there were always food shortages and starvation among those who did not have the kings money and were not beneficiaries of the king’s many official charities that threw the scraps of the rich to the poor. In order to get food, she would have to beg or she would have to enslave herself or prostitute herself.
If she wanted to have children, she would have to find a male slave who would remain in the king’s employment while she raised her children. On this island there would be many professions that did not exist in the Anarchist Island, including charity workers, priests, bankers, Temple builders, golf course attendants, insurance agents, police, military, judiciary and the staff of the king’s personal attendants, none of whom contributed to the agriculture.
Since the king was waited on, hand and foot, the king could concentrate on the more important tasks of discussing the Communist Yeshiva God with his theologians, and he would have many public duties including meeting with the rich people and coming to the openings of their new buildings and so forth. Once a year the king would send a public message to all his people, encouraging them to believe in his Communist Yeshiva God and asking for peace and an end to all crime and Communist terrorism.
Revolution on the Capitalist Island.
One shall be taken and one shall be left behind.
84% are enslaved of which 28% are very poor.
The poorest persons on the Island are the women and children.
It is clear that the minority are the oppressors and that the majority are enslaved. In this system, those who are the richest half do not want to lose their privileges in the rat race, and to slide back down to the level of the poorest half, and these people are bribed with the King’s bread and circuses and hypnotised by his religion. The object of the Capitalist game is to please the king, and the king has the power of bribery and can employ mercenaries (professional soldiers), and it is this bribery that keeps him in power. If it is discovered that the King’s God is not the Communist Yeshiva after all, but that the king is molesting and sacrificing children to Molest in the Baal Groves, then this would make no difference to the kings army for they are not paid to question the king and hypnotised and brined to be totally obedient to the King, and it is only the king who can decide good and evil.
In the Revolution, 50% of the people (the collaborators) will have to be executed and no mercy or quarter must be shown, for the king shows none to his enemies.
The King cannot bribe all the people all of the time
If there is a Revolution, the majority of the people would have rebel at the same time. The king cannot bribe everyone at the same time, since if he increases all wages and gives everyone 10 times more money, and there is the same amount of goods and services for sale, soon everything will cost ten times what it once cost. The king can only bribe his inner court and the wealth distribution is like a pyramid, where those at the top have more tokens and those at the bottom are starving and dependent on the king’s many charities.
What is to be done? How Revolution as a Thief in the Night?
24 hour Revolution
Fortunately the king and all the rich people live in the same neighbourhood of the Island, while the poor live in another neighbourhood, though there are even elites in the poor areas who control the poor on behalf of the king; just as it is in this world. One solution would be some kind of nuclear device that would totally eradicate the neighbourhoods of the 10% rich, and though would scatter radiation to the poor people on an island, this would not be the case in the real world that we live in today. When London and Washington are destroyed, this will not affect persons in Africa, for example. The waters that supply the rich persons with drinking water could also be poisoned for example. What is important is that all executions take place within 24 hours and that no mercy or quarter is shown, for there must be no possibility of counterrevolution and all counterrevolutionaries must be instantly eradicated. In War there are no trials, just as it is with the CIA/MI6/Templar/Nazi narco-terrorists.
As a thief in the night.
The king has a professional army, however if all persons simply took up a rod of iron at the same time and made a surprise attack like a thief in the night on an hour when they rich were sleeping and expected it least, the king could be overthrown.
Enlightenment and the Bodhisattva. The Messianic martyr.
The Bodhisattva in Buddhism is the person who attains personal enlightenment, but rather than staying in Heaven, goes back to liberate the rest of the world from evil. This is a Communist analogy.
A
Revolutionary lands on the Anarchist Island, and it is an Economic Paradise
and he is just one of the many male servants of the women, however he knows
that the Capitalist Island exists so he leaves Paradise in search of Hell.
The King’s First Messiah
On landing on the Capitalist Island, the revolutionary surveys his potential
army. On this Island the majority are the poor and they do not accept the
king’s religion; these are the Muslims, the Communists, etc. The Christians
mostly support the king and his charities, since the king worships a Communist
Jew as God and this Communist Jew is the ‘Messiah.’ Some of the Christians
merely want to reform the system and have a welfare state, while others hold
that whatever the king does, he does in the name of Jewish Communist, and
so the king must be good.
The King’s Propaganda Media Empire.
The king has his own newsletter which is posted on many of the trees, and this allows him to define good and evil. By the king’s definition, his Yeshiva God is the most good, true, loving, caring, selfless Communist, who is good like God is good, and the king and all who worship the Communist martyr are to be saved by their God in the afterlife, even though they were evil like Satan and not good like the Communist Jew.
The execution of the Messianic Revolutionary
Even though the king is evil, he defines whatever he does as good, since he does it with the ‘official’ authority of the Communist Jew. All other persons on the island who claim to represent the Communist Jew are considered heretics. All enemies of the king are evil, false and illegal.
The Revolutionary begins to incite violence against the king by placing posters all over the island. This way he can speak to everyone at the same time. So the king issues a there is a reward of 30 of the king’s credits for the capture of the terrorist. The king is furious and has the revolutionary arrested and executed.
The Rebellion of the King’s Only Son.
‘She brought forth a male child,
one who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron, but her child was caught
up to God and his throne.’
The Only Son of the king has been watching his father all his life and he does not want to be king; he dreams of the Anarchist Island, and he wants to turn the Capitalist Island into the Anarchist Island, so he leaves his palace and goes off in search of how to overthrow his father. He weeps over the deaths of those whom his father tortured and murdered with the sword of his mouth and swears vengeance and War unto to the Death. He fears God and he does not want his robes to be stained with the blood of the innocent, but with the blood of the guilty. Either his father and the parasites who collaborate with him must die, or he must die, but either way, he will seek to bring the Revolution that others died for and he shall join them in death if necessary.
He knows that if he kills his father, some other person will take his place, and that he has to eradicate all his father’s mercenaries on a day and an hour. He believes that if the Revolution takes longer than 24 hours, there will be no revolution and there will merely be reforms, and there will be a new king.
The son knows that there was a time when his ancestors were equal to all others and one of them seized power and started a tyranny that led to a monarchy. All Monarchy begins with one tyrant and it passes to his children.
So
the Only Son of the King begins a process of educating the people of the Island,
and like the executed Communist before him, he too goes around putting up
propaganda posters and calling for solidarity with the Muslims who also seek
to overthrow the king, though he is not a Muslim himself and he does not want
an Islamic government.
The king hears about this and orders that whoever is putting up the posters
and inciting Revolution must be a terrorist and that he must die. When the
king hears that it is his only son that is doing this, he is brokenhearted
and he weeps, and considers the son to be no longer his, however he has not
the heart to execute him, and so for a short while the Only Son ‘walks on
water.’
Because the king’s son is doing all this, the people know that he is not doing
it because he seeks power or wealth, for all the power and wealth of his father
would have been his anyway. The son knows that eventually his father and the
10% rich will have had enough of him, and that his death is inevitable, however
he carries on and spends his life propagandising and attempting to ‘create’
for the conditions for the revolution that others are waiting and praying
and hoping for. Every time that the Muslims attack his father’s servants and
kill them, he puts up more posters, thanking God for the Muslims and calling
for solidarity with them. When the State Capitalists (the Marxists) attack
the rich, he supports them too, though he is not a Statist. Any person, for
whatever reason that attacks the king, the king’s son calls for solidarity
with that person.
The Conditions for Revolution.
If Revolution takes more than 24 hours, it will not be a revolution.
The king’s son is only one person, and he is outnumbered by the Muslims and the State Capitalists, but he continues to advocate the system of the Anarchist Island.
The king’s police complain to the king that no other person could get away with that and that the king is a hypocrite, so one day the king’s son is killed. The king does not mention it in his propaganda and he tries to forget about it. However, suddenly there are no Anarchist posters and there is only a memory of what the king’s son believed in, and instead of being the king’s son whom they once despised, they now have a martyr. Now no amount of propaganda and no amount of religion and no amount of calling on the memory of a Jewish Communist will work any more for the King’s hypocrite priests.
When
people read the king’s propaganda and the king refers to himself as a good,
true, legal person who tells the truth, they
compare this to the son of the king who in the king’s eyes was an evil, false,
illegal collaborator with terrorists.
When
the king’s son died it should have been his father who wept for him, but since
his father considered his son to be his enemy, it is the enemies of the king
who miss the son and who weep for him and who take flowers to his grave. Soon
others start putting up the same posters calling for the establishment of
an Anarchist island, and they do so in the name of the Son of the King, whom
they say is their ‘spiritual king’ for his Judgment was good and his father’s
Judgment was evil.
Every time the king kills one of the terrorists, or a person dies of hunger,
the people think of the son of the king and his call for Revolution. The son
of the king now becomes the new martyr of the poorest people, and the poorer
they are, they more they believe that they represent the king’s son.
Once the hearts of the people of the island are one with the son of the king, this becomes the ‘subjective’ (personal or ‘inner’) conditions for the Revolution. This was achieved merely by propaganda and by the death of one person, who was absolutely no different to the poor children who had died of hunger, and the King’s Son had no greater or lesser value in the eyes of God than a child who died of hunger, and if he had been on the Anarchist Feminist island, he would just have been one of the many servants of the women.
Now
that the people have a clear idea of what is an ‘ideal island’ this idea (i.e.,
not a sense) of Truth, and True Judgment can be passed from mouth to mouth,
and all persons can consider it and discuss it. Unlike the king’s uniformed
police and the king’s money, this idea has no objective (material) form. The
king’s police may see a person walking along the street, and the person may
have the king’s Mark and the king’s uniform, yet the police cannot see the
‘idea’ inside the person’s head, and such ideas once implanted, cannot be
easily crushed.
This ‘idea’ of Revolution and of the Judgment of the king’s son, as to who
is good and who is evil, is compared to the king’s definition of good and
evil. Now every time the people read the king’s propaganda, they compare the
use of the worlds ‘good, true, legal, etc.’ to the definition of the king’s
son, and if the king states ‘Muslim X is illegal,’ the people begin to think
that ‘Since Muslim X’ is illegal, just as the king’s son was illegal, perhaps
Muslim X is good like the king’s son was good, like God is good, not like
the evil king who is evil like Satan is evil, and yet who claims to be good
like God.
We cannot know God with our 5 senses, and because of this anyone can say anything that they want about God and get away with it; even some of the most evil people in human history such as Bush, Moon, Sharon, Hitler and Blair; though even Hitler was not responsible for the Holocaust of 300 million children who currently have no food due to Usury, though Hitler would, given the chance, have killed as many people as the Usuryists today kill and also plan to kill in their Final Holocaust to reduce population to one billion Illuminati masters and slaves.
It is not they who have the most expensive propaganda who speak the Truth, for there is no relationship between the Truth, a Lie and the amount of money spent propagating either.
In time the son of the King’s definition of what is a good person and an evil person becomes prevalent in the minds of the people. Such a simple truth can be passed from generation to generation and requires no sophist to interpret, whereas to speak like the king’s Sophists and theologians and to confuse people, requires a great deal of education. To speak like an educated fool required a long expensive process of indoctrination and hypnotism, whereas to speak the truth of Anarchism does not.
Politics and Falsification.
The study of the past history of politics and law can be ‘learned’ by reading books, and this is referred to as ‘political science,’ however the Judgment of political truth is subjective and is contained within the question ‘What is good and what is evil?
To falsify ones political, Economic and legal positions, there is no scientific method where what is non scientific can be falsified. To falsify such matters, all persons would have to personally feel that the system of the king’s son was ‘good’ and that the king and his government were evil. Unfortunately, people lie. Even if the king thought that the Anarchist system would be morally ‘good’ and better for the poor people than the current system, the king still considers the present system good (useful) for himself and the best (most useful) of all possible systems.
Falsification in philosophy and in Personalism.
In philosophy (‘sense’ or ‘5 senses language), we can look at a ‘CIA drug dealing,’ or a ‘Tree’ and if we doubt their existence we can ask others if they see it also and if they have considered the same evidence. Since this is scientific if 10% of the people we ask offer a contradiction such as ‘The CIA are not drug’s dealers’ or ‘That is not a tree,’ this may not be because the tree is not a tree or the CIA are not drug’s dealers, but because the people making such a claim are Liars (i.e. evil).
If 10% offer abuse and contradiction, then we may still claim that those persons were liars and that there are many others who do see the tree, and who do know that the CIA are narco-terrorists. Similarly with what is Personal, the only way to verify what is personal is to check it with other persons.
If we say that Anarchist Communism represents the truth, then the Sophists may say ‘How do you know (sense with your five senses)?’ and yet they cannot answer such a question about their own political system. Whatever is personal cannot be known with the five senses. If we point at an Anarchist collective of volunteers, then no such collective will ever satisfy the Capitalists, because they may say, ‘Oh that is evil, for those people have abandoned all money and private property and they share everything in common and such a thing is not what good Christian Capitalists do, and that a good (i.e. a useful idiot) Christian would bee a CIA narco-terrorist collaborator and would be supporting Bush’s war against the poor.’
They who look for a scientific proof of what is not scientific shall wait for ever. We are persons, not machines. What is not able to be sensed in the material world, is what is most important to us. Anything that we can have a pound or a kilo of, is less important to us. We cannot have a pound of ideals, reason, memory, dreams, love, truth, beauty, and these matters cannot anyway be separated, for we have no separation within us, and we are just one person in a community of persons of 6 billion persons. Another person’s body can be ‘sensed’ with our 5 senses and we may say ‘that is a person’ however it is we who are subjects of consciousness who know that the person is a person and not a robot, a dead body or a lifelike dummy in the window of a department store.
A Review.
We cannot have ‘proof’ of what is not provable.
Once we have separated sense (what can be objectively known by scientists) from non sense (what is personal), we can go on to the personal Judgment of good and evil
Can the answer to the question of what is good and evil be Personally Falsified and Verified? Yes, but good and evil cannot be verified or falsified in the same way as the existence of a ‘tree,’ or in the same way as we know that the Templar Usuryists are narco-terrorists, pornographers and drug money launderers, for these are ‘objective’ evident claims, whereas good and evil are a personal Judgment based on the goodness of the personal ‘Oh My God.’
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Hitler’s use of the word ‘good.’
It is clear since around 40% of Germany in the 1932 election voted for Hitler, that they considered Hitler to be a good person and not an evil person. If only the Satanists voted for Hitler, and Hitler claimed to be evil, not good, it would be another matter, but Hitler did not state in public that he was evil, rather he stated in public that he was good. Publications like ‘Satan and the Swastika,’ and ‘Occult Reich’ would argue that Hitler was evil and that he knew that he was evil, however when Hitler made his public speeches, he did not speak of his secret occult (non sense) beliefs, and claimed to be good just as God was good and not evil like Satan is evil. If Hitler had claimed to be evil and to worship Satan, few Germans would have voted for him. Instead he claimed to be good like God is good, and when he spoke, Germans wept and were mesmerised, hypnotised and bewitched by his language, and his language was the language of Babel (using very few key words to confuse). When Hitler said ‘good’ (like God is good) Germans assumed that he must be ‘good’ and associated his goodness with God’s goodness.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Mass Hypnotism, De-hypnotism and the ‘Ultimate TV Philosophy Game Show.’
Now that we understand the nature of mass hypnotism, the use of the word ‘good’ by evil persons and the rules of argument and evidence let us begin the Debate on the Philosophy Island of 100 persons who are representatives of the world population as previously outlined. Half would be women and many would be children.
Such
an island would be an ‘ultimate’ TV show, but the Capitalists would be unlikely
to allow such a thing to take place, since all definitions of good and evil
would be subject to falsification and verification, and anyone would be the
free to Judge anyone else in the world, which is what evil fears most
____________________________
Let us say that the 100 people gather together in the island’s forum (arena) and there is only one questions in this TV show, ‘What is good and evil?’ This is a personal question and there will never be any ‘proof’ or ’evidence,’ and we will have to attempt to find common definitions for what can never ever be defined.
During the TV show, all persons will have the power to speak at the forum for ‘only’ One hour. This shall be 100 hours of debate. My debate would perhaps be banned in the UK and the US and perhaps only be broadcast in the Third World. Is this fair? Of course it is not fair. Therefore all the debates would be broadcast live to all nations.
One would be executed and One would survive.
What is the point of the debate? In ‘Big Brother TV’ the prize is only offered to one person. In this show, the same prize shall be offered only to 50% of the contestants and this would be ‘life’ (i.e. the avoidance of death) Each week, the world would listen to the debates, and eliminate 50% of the persons who had spoken. Who shall speak first and who shall speak last? They would draw lots for this?
One shall be taken and one shall be left behind.
This is Judgment Day. When each person speaks, they cannot speak about anything other than the question or a they can be shouted down and people can state ‘irrelevant.’ If a person wants to speak about ‘cookery’ there would be no Judge to stop them, but the people would act as Judge and they would know the rule of the game.
Once the 50 persons had been executed, the debate would continue between the other 50 persons forever, and there would be no prizes offered. If there was a crime on the island, all 50 persons would gather together in the forum and there would be no Judges, no Lawyers, no police and no military, and all females would be armed with a rod of iron (i.e. a hammer), and all males would be disarmed. This debate would continue.
Mars
speaks to the masses on Good and Evil Island.
On the Revolutionary War of Economic Salvation and the Final Holocaust.
To
the 100 people gathered here. To the 6 Billion people.
On Christianity (Christ-like-ness), or ‘Christ-like persons’ (i.e. Communists) and the False Christians (or Satan-like persons).
’There is only One God.
God
is good like I am good, like the Jewish Communist Yeshiva was good, like we
are mostly good, not evil like the Capitalists are evil, like Satan is evil,
like George Bush, Moon, Blair and Sharon are evil, like the rich and the Usuryists
are evil. Goodness is common. Evil is peculiar and uncommon. They who say
that they are ‘Christ-like’ (Christian) and who say ‘we do not compare ourselves
to Yeshiva’ are evil. Only they who claim to be Christ-like persons and who
say that they ‘do’ compare themselves to the Jewish Communist and that they
‘are’ like him and that they share his Communist anti-propertyist, anti-monetarist
positions are the true Christians and only they are worthy of life.’
(nb: At this point I have lost at least 10% or more of the richest among the world’s population. I have alienated my self from almost all False Christ-like persons, who are likely to call for my execution)
What is a good person and what is an evil person?
We live in a real Island in space of 6 thousand billion. We are representatives. 5 of us were starving to death prior to coming here. Around 90% of us were poor.
First of all let us examine the definitions of good and evil of some of the philosophers of history and their final solutions.
A: Hitler’s Final Solution : (begin) All persons of white appearance are evil. All Communists must die. All who are homosexuals must die, all who use drugs must die, all person who listen to Jazz music (i.e., defined by Hitler as ‘black’ music) must die. They must die that the good shall live. There must only be white people on our island. Hitler’s words and edicts shall serve as law in the 1000 Year Reich (government). (end)
B:
Cult leader Sun Myung Moon’s Final Solution
(begin) All Communists must die, all homosexuals must die, all adulterers
must die (except Moon and his cultists) all women who refuse to be
married (to Moon) must die, all women with small non-Korean hips (non
childbearing in appearance), must die, all anti-cultists must die. All
money and property should belong to Moon. The males are the superior gender,
God is a transcendent male and Moon and his sons will rule the island as kings
and only their words and edicts shall serve as law and they shall be above
the law and none may sit in Judgment on them but God. (End)
C: The Final Solution of the Grand Master of Freemasonry and his New World Order (Illuminati) of Luciferians.
‘(Begin) The world’s population must be reduced to one billion Illuminated Masters and Slaves; the poor must die that the rich must live; there is no difference between the death of a fly and the 300 million people with no food. 3000 Capitalists and CIA narco-terrorists who died on Sept 11th were Satan’s martyrs and America weeps for them and the 300 million persons with no food were profane (unsaved) persons who are useless eaters, parasites, diseased (unclean), many have been affected by my biological warfare (HIV). The poor must be eradicated brutally and utterly. This Island must build a landing strip for CIA aircraft in order that we can fly in drugs to sell to you, money to bribe the rich, and guns to arm the rich. Only I may issue money here, none may buy or sell without my permission; I own this island and if you want land or food you will have to become slaves to the 10% rich or you will die, and you will have to borrow money from me to buy land or to buy fishing rights. All property is mine; all who oppose that are illegal, false, evil and are terrorists; only the rich are freedom fighters. The poor are evil and the rich are good. We shall have a government and a police and a military and I may buy any of your children for sex and I may do with them as I will and a Red Light district must be created. All my words and edicts shall serve as a Law. (End)’
My Final Solution (Final Judgment)
One shall be taken and one shall be left behind.
All anti-Communists must be executed. My words and edicts shall serve as Law in the 1000 Year Agricultural Revolution of Governmentless economic Communism (Community-ism) and Feminism, whether I live or die.
All
Moon cultists must be executed, all monarchists must be executed, all cultists
must die, all Templar collaborators must die. There shall be no money and
no government and no private property. We do not need a government, we have
a forum where we may meet and argue and then vote on issues. The males are
the servants of the females, and the females are created in the image and
likeness of the One eternal immanent Mother God. If we want to know what is
good and what is evil, we must ask the women not the men, for women are mothers
who want to feed their children and they are less evil than men, many of who
want to enslave your children. Do not pray in public and have no Temples or
religion or ritualism. All religionists and all Governmentalists and all Capitalists
and private propertyists must die. All Freemasons must die; all police, military,
judiciary, Governmentalists who have collaborated with them must die.
There are probably less than 6 million Masonic cultists in the world. Only
one out of a 100 persons in the world lives in Britain. There are 320,000
Masonic cultists in Britain (one out of every 200 persons). They are the minority
among the 6 billion. None shall buy or sell or trade in this island of Earth.
If the CIA land on this island and attempt to sell drugs to the poor, all
persons must rise up in Revolution. All who seek to introduce money to this
island shall die. There shall be no government, nor police, nor military nor
prostitution of any form whatsoever. Marriage is a form of prostitution if
it is the choice of a male and the woman is forced to marry and this shall
be an executable offense for any male; one cannot buy or sell another person
and one cannot possess a woman as property. Only a female may chose a male
and then dispense with him as she sees fit.
(NB I have now lost all the Religious cultists and all the evil people, but I have gained the attention of all women and children and the poor. However I am not attempting populism; I am merely speaking what I hold to be true and what is consistent with my past positions)
Consider
17 of you are aged one month to aged 8
17
of you aged 8 to 16
33 of you are aged be 16 to 35
33 of your are aged 35 to 70
Most
of you have been poor, most would have suffered economically,
a few would be totally emaciated and at least 5 of you are at the point of
death anyway. Shall we kill off all the poor people and leave only the rich
educated people? No. We shall eradicate
the rich that the poor may live.
Law on the Island
No person may interfere with the free will of another person, asides from mothers who will always interfere with their children’s free will, or the children will harm themselves. After puberty all children shall be free. If a man raises a weapon or a fist against another man or woman or attempts to force them to do anything against their free will, by force of violence, this is the origin of the human fall and this must be dealt with or the island shall turn into Hell.
Labour.
In order to live we shall have to eat and build shelters. Clothing shall not be necessary on this island, since it is hot, but in the real world of 6 billion persons where it is cold in many areas, all persons must be entitled to at least one coat and one pair of jeans and a T shirt and a pair of shoes. Who shall make these and who shall grow the cotton? This shall take only a fraction of our total labour. Some people on this island could grow cotton and others could go fishing and others could farm. All the fish will be brought to the community kitchen and distributed to all persons, and all cotton will be equally shared and all crops shall be equally shared. All property is theft; all private land is theft. If any woman or man says ‘this land belongs to me’ then that person must die, for they are a threat to those who go fishing. If any fisherman says ‘I created this fish, I own this fish, God gave this fish to me, I pulled it out of the sea with my labour and this fish is mine and I can barter it for property, a sex slave, and none may fish but me’ then that person must die.
Execution Lists
Capitalists. Religionists (with the exception of the militant Muslims and they who have fought against the Templars, but their demands for an Islamic government and Islamic Law must be withdrawn)
Christians (with the exception of Christian Communists).
All who seek to build places of worship. The divine (God-like) being is the human being and God is worshipped when we love each other, for we are all the children of God, and God is not an object like a piece of stone or marble or glass, but a subject like a person (i.e. a daughter of God).
All who worship God as an object or a transcendent male Capitalist shall die. All Paternalists shall die. All who consider the males to be superior to the females shall die. There is no such a thing (like a stone or a tree) as ‘Pay Love’ or ‘Capitalist Love,’ for only Love that is govern freely is Love.
The time for arguing is over.
War is War.
The Capitalists shall never accept the arguments of they who are good.
The limit of what philosophy can tell regarding the world of 5 senses is known. The rich shall never surrender without a fight.
Revolution is Economic Salvation and Liberation.
Property is Theft.
(At this point I start pounding my fist against a table and I say)
We must crush the Americans, crush the British, Crush the financial Mafia, crush the Religionists, Governmentalists, Private Propertyists, and the pacifists who refuse to fight the Capitalists. All are called to War. None are excused. They who refuse to fight shall die. All women and children are especially called to War.
War is War.
There are limits to philosophy; there are limits to argument. The Nazis did not consider the arguments of the Communists; they shipped them off to the camps; the Anglo American Zionist narco-terrorist alliance of Usuryists have long been defeated by the evidence and argument presented by their anti-Capitalist enemies; however they will never give up without a fight.
Death to America; Death to Zion; Death to Britain.
They have already declared War of Armageddon.
Humanity must rise in Revolution.
People of China you have been betrayed; your leaders have sold out to the financial Mafia and have been bribed; Mao would have shot them; and after they were shot he would have defended their execution since they are not Communists.
One shall be take and one left behind.
Judgment Day. War. Revolution.
Give me Apocalyptic Guerrilla War, Civil War, Revolution and the execution of all categories. My words and edicts shall serve as Law.
Revolution Now..
Nuke London and Washington. All Usuryists must be executed.
Poison the waters of the Capitalist states; create the conditions for Revolution.
If the people know that the penalty for sheltering a Usuryist is the nuclear destruction of their nation, they can choose whether to rise in Revolution or to die with the Capitalists.
War is War.
Give me War and Revolution; give me Armageddon.
War I demand., Blood I demand. I demand the blood sacrifice of the rich.
The rich and their allies must die. The poor must live.
The meek shall inherit the earth and the meek are the women and children and the Communist males who are their servants.
There is only One God.
God is good like me; God is good like the majority of us not evil like the Capitalist god who is Satan (God’s enemy). There is no such thing as a tyranny of the majority; a tyrant is a dictator; there is only the tyranny of the minority and all who disagree must die.
All who seek to form political parties must die.
All Republicans must die. This is democracy. This is 100 persons with an equal vote that shall soon be 50 persons with an equal vote, and all major agricultural planning and all trials can be held here, and no person who is not present may vote for another person, and no group of persons can elect one person to vote for him. There shall be no president and there shall be no Judge and no jury and no lawyers or police and each of you shall have the same vote.
If there is one who is among you who is a danger to the Island, cast a vote and execute that person, but do not simply send him into exile where he can ferment Capitalist revolution elsewhere, for why would you cast a devil out another Island to terrorise children there.
Once the return to year Zero has been established, all males must lose their voting privileges and only females will be allowed to carry weapons (rods of iron). Other males may speak in the forum, but they must not be allowed to cast a vote, for they are the inferior gender and are the servants of the woman who are created in the image and likeness of the One immanent Mother God.
There shall be no prisons. Execution shall be the consequence of any trial.
Send they who are evil to the afterlife and let the ancestors sort them out
These are my demands and my words and edicts shall serve as Law
My words and edicts shall be the whole of the Law
Revolution Now
The Voting on the Island and among the human population.
It is not a question of whether Bush and Moon have a good argument that will convince humanity that they are good and that CIA narco-terrorism and Usury is good, for it is only good (useful) for they and the rich; it is their military strength and wealth that protects those cowards from the masses. I seek to make demands, just as they do, and I seek to convince the people of the world to take up arms against the CIA/Templar/Usuryist narco-terrorists.
Now that I have spoken, all persons on the island have one vote and all persons in the world have one vote.
Let us say that the next person invited to speak is George Bush, Moon, Sharon, Blair, a Nazi and a banker, or their defenders who want the Island to convert to Satan’s Religion of Capitalism, however if they volunteer to speak, they shall also have to submit to execution if they are outvoted and there shall be no narco-terrorist militia to rescue them.
At the end of the week, votes are cast.
90% are poor. 10% are rich. It is likely that the 90% of the world’s population who are poorest, will vote for they who are rich.
Whose vote could I be sure of? In the 1997 General Election in Brixton, London for example, the Independent Communist candidate received 90 votes and in 2001 as an independent Communist, I received not much more than that, against 20,000 for the Usuryist/CIA narco-terrorist collaborator’s party (Blair’s ‘Labour’ Party; i.e. ‘Laborious’ Party; i.e. ‘The Enslavement Party’).
The only people that I could be sure would be unlikely to vote for my execution would be the 300 million persons with no food and the 5 children on the island who are dying of hunger. If I die, I die with them. That is OK by me. Truth will prevail eventually. There shall come a Day and an Hour of Judgment I have perfect faith in that.
The Capitalists would say that I am a Pied Piper and that I am promising free ice cream to the poor and the uneducated (the non Sophists) and they who are anyway about to die. I am not a Pied Piper, for a Pied Piper would be a liar who is illegal, false and evil like Satan is evil, like Bush, Moon, Blair, Sharon and the financial Mafia are evil, not like God is good, like I am good like Yeshiva was good, for they who refer to Yeshiva as good and refer to themselves as evil must die; that is an admission of evil, not an excuse. The evil persons who claim to Christ-like (i.e., Christian) may object to this ands say that I am comparing myself to the Jewish Communist Yeshiva (of course I am), but all persons who define themselves as ‘Christ-like’ are comparing themselves to an anti-propertyist Communist anyway, and only those who can be compared to Yeshiva shall live, and all propertyists shall die.
My opponent’s may not understand who I am speaking to.
Who am I addressing?
My only concern is that the 300 million people with no food and the 5 children who are starving do not vote against me. If the rest of the world votes against me, that is irrelevant to me. If the poorest of the poor vote against me I will weep. If the 10% rich vote against me I will rejoice, for that is my falsification and verification that I spoke the Truth. Even if most of the world is against me, that is not to say that the future children of the world shall be against me, and the future shall be mine, for one can take a person’s life, but one cannot destroy an idea if the entire world is exposed to it, for the Flaming Sword that comes out of the mouth of Christ is mightier than any parasite Templar King’s sword of steel. If the Templar demon who would be king was a warrior and not a coward who hid behind his demon mercenaries, he would have taken up the challenge of my sword of steel long ago.
The 90% of the world that is poor will be more sympathetic to the poorest 10% of the world than the 10% who are rich.
If I am executed, the 5 starving children and the 300 million persons with no food shall have a martyr, even if I have lived in rich nations prior to coming to the island.
The rich my say that my father is an overtly declared Templar Satanist (King-War-Sun, or Baal, or Son), who like Horus, only sees with one eye, and that I too have his name (War, Sword of Sun, Sun or Baal or Son). This would be even more reason for the poor to believe me, and this would not go against me, for I have forsaken all and repented of the sins of my forefathers.
END OF PART SIX
INDEX TO PART I: THE FIRST SEAL
INDEX TO PART II: THE SECOND SEAL
INDEX TO PART III: THE THIRD SEAL
INDEX TO PART IV: THE FOURTH SEAL
INDEX TO PART V: THE FIFTH SEAL
INDEX TO PART VII: THE SEVENTH SEAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|